Paper · 1992 · Crop Science

Growth Regulator Effects on Aboveground Dry Matter Partitioning during Grain Fill of Spring Barley

B. L. Ma; Donald L. Smith

11
claims
34
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It is not clear whether alteration in grain yield due to application of plant growth regulators (PGRs) to cereal crops is caused by altered dry matter accumulation, changes in partitioning of dry matter into grain, or both. A 3‐yr field study was conducted using two widely grown spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Cadette and Leger, to evaluate the effects of chlormequat (CCC) (2‐chloroethyl‐ N,N,N ‐ trimethylammonium chloride) or ethephon (2‐chloroethyl phosphonic acid) on dry matter production and partitioning among plant parts during grain fill. The growth regulators were applied at three stages of crop development. The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989. Treatments consisted of application of CCC (1.2 kg a.i. ha −1 ) or ethephon (0.48 kg a.i. ha −1 ) at Zadoks growth stage (ZGS) 13, 30 and 39. Ethephon application at ZGS enhanced dry matter accumulation in the nongrain plant parts (chaff, culms, leaf blades, and leaf sheaths) in both 1988 and 1989, and decreased grain mass per spike (number of grains per spike and 1000‐ grain weight) in 1989. This resulted in a yield reduction in that year. In 1988, an increased grain mass per spike with ethephon resulted in improved grain yield. For Cadette, CCC treatment also increased dry matter accumulation in leaf blades, leaf sheaths, and chaff in 1988. Grain yield per square meter was also increased by a ZGS‐13 application in that year. In general, this work revealed that PGR application does not increase total dry matter accumulation on a per‐shoot basis, but does affect dry matter partitioning patterns, leading to alterations in grain yield that may be positive or negative depending on the conditions during a given crop year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon applied at ZGS enhanced dry matter accumulation in nongrain plant parts in both 1988 and 1989.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Organ / stage
nongrain plant parts (chaff, culms, leaf blades, and leaf sheaths)e1
Treatment
Ethephon application at ZGSe1
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
enhancede1
Qualifier
in both 1988 and 1989e1
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethephon application at ZGS enhanced dry matter accumulation in the nongrain plant parts (chaff, culms, leaf blades, and leaf sheaths) in both 1988 and 1989, and decreased grain mass per spike (number of grains per spike and 1000‐ grain weight) in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon applied at ZGS decreased the number of grains per spike in 1989.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Ethephon application at ZGSe1
Outcome
number of grains per spikee1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
in 1989e1
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethephon application at ZGS enhanced dry matter accumulation in the nongrain plant parts (chaff, culms, leaf blades, and leaf sheaths) in both 1988 and 1989, and decreased grain mass per spike (number of grains per spike and 1000‐ grain weight) in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon applied at ZGS decreased 1000-grain weight in 1989.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Ethephon application at ZGSe1
Outcome
1000‐ grain weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
in 1989e1
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethephon application at ZGS enhanced dry matter accumulation in the nongrain plant parts (chaff, culms, leaf blades, and leaf sheaths) in both 1988 and 1989, and decreased grain mass per spike (number of grains per spike and 1000‐ grain weight) in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon applied at ZGS reduced grain yield in 1989.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Ethephon application at ZGSe1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
reductione2
Qualifier
in that yeare2
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethephon application at ZGS enhanced dry matter accumulation in the nongrain plant parts (chaff, culms, leaf blades, and leaf sheaths) in both 1988 and 1989, and decreased grain mass per spike (number of grains per spike and 1000‐ grain weight) in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1175 · show in text ↑
e2

“This resulted in a yield reduction in that year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon in 1988 resulted in improved grain yield through an increased grain mass per spike.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
ethephone3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
improvede3
Qualifier
In 1988e3
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1988, an increased grain mass per spike with ethephon resulted in improved grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon in 1988 increased grain mass per spike.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
ethephone3
Outcome
grain mass per spikee3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
In 1988e3
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1988, an increased grain mass per spike with ethephon resulted in improved grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For cultivar Cadette, CCC increased dry matter accumulation in leaf blades, leaf sheaths and chaff in 1988.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Cadettee4
Organ / stage
leaf blades, leaf sheaths, and chaffe4
Treatment
CCC treatmente4
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
in 1988e4
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e4

“For Cadette, CCC treatment also increased dry matter accumulation in leaf blades, leaf sheaths, and chaff in 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A ZGS-13 application increased grain yield per square meter in that year.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
ZGS‐13 applicatione5
Outcome
Grain yield per square metere5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
in that yeare5
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e5

“Grain yield per square meter was also increased by a ZGS‐13 application in that year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR application does not increase total dry matter accumulation on a per-shoot basis.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
PGR applicatione6
Outcome
total dry matter accumulatione6
Direction
does not increasee6
Qualifier
on a per‐shoot basise6
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e6

“PGR application does not increase total dry matter accumulation on a per‐shoot basis, but does affect dry matter partitioning patterns, leading to alterations in grain yield that may be positive or negative depending on the conditions during a given crop year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR application affects dry matter partitioning patterns in spring barley.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
PGR applicatione6
Outcome
dry matter partitioning patternse6
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e6

“PGR application does not increase total dry matter accumulation on a per‐shoot basis, but does affect dry matter partitioning patterns, leading to alterations in grain yield that may be positive or negative depending on the conditions during a given crop year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR application alters grain yield in spring barley in a direction that depends on crop-year conditions.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
PGR applicatione6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Qualifier
depending on the conditions during a given crop yeare6
Setting
McGill University, Canadae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The experiments were conducted on Bearbrook clay soil (fine, mixed, nonacid, Mesic Humaquept) at McGill University, Canada, from 1987 to 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–779 · show in text ↑
e6

“PGR application does not increase total dry matter accumulation on a per‐shoot basis, but does affect dry matter partitioning patterns, leading to alterations in grain yield that may be positive or negative depending on the conditions during a given crop year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1813 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

stage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

class · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 28 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.