Paper · 1994 · Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde

Effect of drying and rewetting the topsoil on root growth of maize and rape in different soil depths

Christof Engels; Martin Mollenkopf; Horst Marschner

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the present experiments was to determine how fast maize and rape plants respond to drying and subsequent rewetting of the topsoil by changing their rooting patterns in different soil depths. Plants were grown in a glasshouse in large (120 × 10.5 × 5 cm) containers which allowed continuous observation of root growth and control of soil water contents at all depths. In both species, drying of the topsoil resulted in a rapid (after 6 d) decrease of root growth in the topsoil (0–40 cm) and an increase in the subsoil (80–120 cm). Increase of root growth in the subsoil preceded the decrease hi the topsoil. Drying of the topsoil decreased shoot P concentrations in both species, whereas the concentrations of N, K and Ca were not significantly affected despite enriched fertilizer levels in the topsoil. In both species, after rewetting, root growth in the topsoil rapidly recovered, and after 5 d exceeded that of the continuously irrigated plants. This increase of root growth an the topsoil occurred at the expense of root growth in the subsoil. The results demonstrate that maize and rape plants may rapidly respond to drying and rewetting the topsoil by locally increasing root growth in soil layers with the most favourable conditions. This plasticity in root growth is a factor which contributes to the maintenance of an adequate nutritional status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

maize topsoil drying caused decrease in root growth in the topsoil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drying of the topsoile0
Outcome
root growth in the topsoile0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
topsoil (0–40 cm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both species, drying of the topsoil resulted in a rapid (after 6 d) decrease of root growth in the topsoil (0–40 cm) and an increase in the subsoil (80–120 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

maize topsoil drying caused increase in increase in the subsoil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drying of the topsoile0
Outcome
increase in the subsoile0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
subsoil (80–120 cm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both species, drying of the topsoil resulted in a rapid (after 6 d) decrease of root growth in the topsoil (0–40 cm) and an increase in the subsoil (80–120 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rape topsoil drying caused decrease in root growth in the topsoil.

Treatment
drying of the topsoile0
Outcome
root growth in the topsoile0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
topsoil (0–40 cm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both species, drying of the topsoil resulted in a rapid (after 6 d) decrease of root growth in the topsoil (0–40 cm) and an increase in the subsoil (80–120 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rape topsoil drying caused increase in increase in the subsoil.

Treatment
drying of the topsoile0
Outcome
increase in the subsoile0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
subsoil (80–120 cm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both species, drying of the topsoil resulted in a rapid (after 6 d) decrease of root growth in the topsoil (0–40 cm) and an increase in the subsoil (80–120 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

maize shoot P concentration decreased.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Drying of the topsoile0
Outcome
shoot P concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drying of the topsoil decreased shoot P concentrations in both species, whereas the concentrations of N, K and Ca were not significantly affected despite enriched fertilizer levels in the topsoil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

maize shoot N, K and Ca concentrations were not significantly affected.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Drying of the topsoile0
Outcome
concentrations of N, K and Cae0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drying of the topsoil decreased shoot P concentrations in both species, whereas the concentrations of N, K and Ca were not significantly affected despite enriched fertilizer levels in the topsoil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rape shoot P concentration decreased.

Treatment
Drying of the topsoile0
Outcome
shoot P concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drying of the topsoil decreased shoot P concentrations in both species, whereas the concentrations of N, K and Ca were not significantly affected despite enriched fertilizer levels in the topsoil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

rape shoot N, K and Ca concentrations were not significantly affected.

Treatment
Drying of the topsoile0
Outcome
concentrations of N, K and Cae0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drying of the topsoil decreased shoot P concentrations in both species, whereas the concentrations of N, K and Ca were not significantly affected despite enriched fertilizer levels in the topsoil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

maize root growth recovered and exceeded continuously irrigated plants after five days.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
rewettinge0
Outcome
root growth in the topsoile0
Direction
exceedede0
Qualifier
after 5 de0
Comparator
continuously irrigated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both species, after rewetting, root growth in the topsoil rapidly recovered, and after 5 d exceeded that of the continuously irrigated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rape root growth recovered and exceeded continuously irrigated plants after five days.

Treatment
rewettinge0
Outcome
root growth in the topsoile0
Direction
exceedede0
Qualifier
after 5 de0
Comparator
continuously irrigated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both species, after rewetting, root growth in the topsoil rapidly recovered, and after 5 d exceeded that of the continuously irrigated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

maize subsoil root growth decreased as topsoil root growth increased.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
topsoile0
Outcome
root growth in the subsoile0
Direction
at the expense ofe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This increase of root growth an the topsoil occurred at the expense of root growth in the subsoil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rape subsoil root growth decreased as topsoil root growth increased.

Organ / stage
topsoile0
Outcome
root growth in the subsoile0
Direction
at the expense ofe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This increase of root growth an the topsoil occurred at the expense of root growth in the subsoil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

processing · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

processing · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

processing · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 40 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.