Paper · 1985 · Agronomy Journal

Aluminum Toxicity Effects on Growth and Nutrient Composition in Wheat1

K. Ohki

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Aluminum toxicity is frequently the limiting factor to crop production in acid soils. The diagnosis of Al toxicity for a specific wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar could be simplified by tissue analysis. Greenhouse studies were undertaken to determine the critical Al toxicity level for the cultivar ‘Stacy’ and tissue nutrients affected by Al status. Wheat plants were grown in 10 levels of Al (0, 1.9, 3.7, 9.3, 18.5, 37.1, 74.1, 148, 222, and 297 µM Al) in nutrient solution for 28 days. Aluminum toxicity reduced top dry weight, root dry weight, plant height, tiller numbers, and top/root dry weight ratio. Aluminum concentrations in the blade and stem tissues were low (maximum of 0.3 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1, the most recently developed leaf with a developed ligule) and were linearly related to Al in nutrient solution. Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat. The critical Al toxicity levels, defined as the Al concentration in the tissue associated with a 10% decrease from maximum top dry weight due to toxicity, were 0.12 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1 and 0.08 mmol kg −1 in the whole plant. Knowing these tissue values, one may be able to detect Al toxicity from similar uncontaminated tissue from the Stacy cultivar sampled in the field. Using washed Blade 1 would be preferable to using the whole plant because soil contamination would be minimized. Aluminum toxicity decreased all elemental concentrations in Blade 1 and whole plants. With the exception of P and K in Blade 1, the decreases in elemental concentrations were related by either a linear or quadratic regression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium toxicity reduced top and root dry weight, plant height, tillers and top-to-root weight ratio.

Material
Stacye1
Treatment
Aluminum toxicitye0
Outcome
top dry weight, root dry weight, plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum toxicity reduced top dry weight, root dry weight, plant height, tiller numbers, and top/root dry weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium toxicity reduced tillers and top-to-root dry weight ratio.

Material
Stacye1
Treatment
Aluminum toxicitye0
Outcome
tiller numbers, and top/root dry weight ratioe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum toxicity reduced top dry weight, root dry weight, plant height, tiller numbers, and top/root dry weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blade and stem aluminium concentrations were low, at most 0.3 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1.

Material
Stacye1
Organ / stage
blade and stem tissuese0
Outcome
Aluminum concentrationse0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0.3 mmol kg −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum concentrations in the blade and stem tissues were low (maximum of 0.3 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1, the most recently developed leaf with a developed ligule)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue aluminium concentration was linearly related to solution aluminium.

Material
Stacye1
Treatment
Al in nutrient solutione0
Outcome
Aluminum concentrationse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were linearly related to Al in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
e2

“Aluminum concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–648 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stacy wheat did not readily accumulate aluminium.

Material
Stacye0
Outcome
Aluminum is not readily accumulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical aluminium toxicity level in Blade 1 was 0.12 mmol kg −1.

Material
Stacye1
Organ / stage
Blade 1e0
Outcome
critical Al toxicity levelse2
Value
0.12 mmol kg −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were 0.12 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1 and 0.08 mmol kg −1 in the whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
e2

“The critical Al toxicity levels, defined as the Al concentration in the tissue associated with a 10% decrease from maximum top dry weight due to toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1044 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical aluminium toxicity level in the whole plant was 0.08 mmol kg −1.

Material
Stacye1
Organ / stage
whole plante0
Outcome
critical Al toxicity levelse2
Value
0.08 mmol kg −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were 0.12 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1 and 0.08 mmol kg −1 in the whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
e2

“The critical Al toxicity levels, defined as the Al concentration in the tissue associated with a 10% decrease from maximum top dry weight due to toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1044 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Washed Blade 1 was preferred over whole-plant tissue for field diagnosis because it minimizes soil contamination.

Material
Stacye1
Outcome
Using washed Blade 1e0
Qualifier
soil contamination would be minimizede0
Comparator
the whole plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using washed Blade 1 would be preferable to using the whole plant because soil contamination would be minimized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium toxicity decreased all elemental concentrations in Blade 1 and whole plants.

Material
Stacye1
Organ / stage
Blade 1 and whole plantse0
Treatment
Aluminum toxicitye0
Outcome
elemental concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum toxicity decreased all elemental concentrations in Blade 1 and whole plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Except for P and K in Blade 1, elemental decreases followed linear or quadratic regressions.

Organ / stage
Blade 1e0
Outcome
decreases in elemental concentrationse0
Qualifier
With the exception of P and K in Blade 1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the exception of P and K in Blade 1, the decreases in elemental concentrations were related by either a linear or quadratic regression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1604 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑

heavy metal · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

53 papers: 8 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

heavy metal · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 3 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.