Paper · 2001 · Weed Biology and Management

Relationship between safening activity of dymron and fenclorim to pretilachlor and glutathione S‐transferase activity in rice

FAN DENG; YUJI YAMADA; KENJI USUI

13
claims
36
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Dymron [1‐(α,α‐dimethybenzyl)‐3‐( p ‐tolyl)urea] and fenclorim (4,6‐dichloro‐2‐phenylpyrimidine) were found to exhibit a safening activity on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor [2‐chloro‐2′,6′diethyl‐ N ‐(2‐propoxyethyl)acetanilide] injury. By pretilachlor treatment at 10 –6 and 10 –5 mol L –1 , the elongation of the third leaves of rice seedlings was reduced by approximately 20 and 40%, and that of the fourth leaves was reduced by approximately 40 and 80%, respectively. Upon the treatment of dymron at 3 × 10 –6 and 10 –5 mol L –1 in combination with pretilachlor, the growth inhibition was half alleviated in the third leaves, and the length of the fourth leaves was almost recovered from 10 –6 mol L ‐1 pretilachlor injury, and was 20–25% recovered from 10 –5 mol L –1 pretilachlor injury. Upon the treatment of fenclorim at 3 × 10 –6 and 10 –5 mol L –1 in combination with pretilachlor, the growth inhibition of rice seedlings was almost alleviated in both the third and the fourth leaves. This result indicated that dymron and fenclorim showed almost the same safening effect on the fourth leaf growth against 10 –6 mol L ‐1 pretilachlor injury, although fenclorim showed higher effects at higher concentrations of pretilachlor. Glutathione S ‐transferase (GST) activities in rice seedlings were investigated after being treated with a herbicide and safener. By pretilachlor treatment at 10 –6 and 10 –5 mol L –1 , the GST activity was approximately 32 and 72% increased in roots, respectively, and a little increased (7–13%) in shoots of two‐leaf‐stage rice seedlings. By dymron treatment at 3 × 10 –6 −10 –5 mol L –1 , the GST activity was 2–30% increased in roots, but was not increased in shoots. By their combination treatment, the GST activity was almost the same or less than that by treatment with pretilachlor alone. In contrast, by fenclorim treatment alone, the GST activity was 43–52 and 33–45% increased in roots and shoots of rice seedlings, respectively. By the combination treatment of pretilachlor and fenclorim, the GST activity was increased 73–126% in shoots and 101–139% in roots, and was much more increased in both shoots and roots compared with treatment of pretilachlor or fenclorim alone. It was found that dymron showed less effect in increasing the GST activity than fenclorim. It is also suggested that dymron did not increase the GST activity in shoots but did increase it slightly in roots, and showed almost no effect on GST increase by pretilachlor in shoots, or rather reduced the increase in roots. From the above results, fenclorim and dymron may have different mechanisms of safening effects on the protection of rice seedlings against pretilachlor injury.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dymron halved the growth inhibition by pretilachlor in third leaves of rice seedlings.

Organ / stage
third leavese4
Treatment
dymrone3
Outcome
growth inhibitione4
Direction
half alleviatede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e3

“Upon the treatment of dymron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–538 · show in text ↑
e4

“the growth inhibition was half alleviated in the third leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dymron almost recovered the length of fourth leaves of rice seedlings from 10-6 mol/L pretilachlor injury.

Organ / stage
fourth leavese5
Treatment
dymrone3
Outcome
length of the fourth leavese5
Direction
almost recoverede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e3

“Upon the treatment of dymron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–538 · show in text ↑
e5

“the length of the fourth leaves was almost recovered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenclorim almost alleviated the growth inhibition by pretilachlor in both third and fourth leaves of rice seedlings.

Organ / stage
the third and the fourth leavese7
Treatment
fenclorime6
Outcome
growth inhibitione7
Direction
almost alleviatede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e6

“Upon the treatment of fenclorim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–863 · show in text ↑
e7

“the growth inhibition of rice seedlings was almost alleviated in both the third and the fourth leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dymron and fenclorim had almost the same safening effect on fourth-leaf growth at 10-6 mol/L pretilachlor; fenclorim gave higher effects at higher pretilachlor concentrations.

Organ / stage
fourth leafe1
Treatment
dymron and fenclorime1
Outcome
safening effect on the fourth leaf growthe1
Direction
almost the samee1
Qualifier
fenclorim showed higher effects at higher concentrations of pretilachlore2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e1

“dymron and fenclorim showed almost the same safening effect on the fourth leaf growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1145 · show in text ↑
e2

“fenclorim showed higher effects at higher concentrations of pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dymron increased GST activity in roots of rice seedlings by 2-30%.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
dymrone3
Outcome
GST activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
2–30%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e3

“Upon the treatment of dymron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–538 · show in text ↑
e1

“the GST activity was 2–30% increased in roots, but was not increased in shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dymron did not increase GST activity in shoots of rice seedlings.

Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
dymrone3
Outcome
GST activitye1
Direction
was not increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e3

“Upon the treatment of dymron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–538 · show in text ↑
e1

“the GST activity was 2–30% increased in roots, but was not increased in shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of dymron and pretilachlor gave GST activity almost the same as or lower than pretilachlor alone.

Treatment
combination treatmente1
Outcome
GST activitye1
Direction
almost the same or lesse1
Comparator
treatment with pretilachlor alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e1

“By their combination treatment, the GST activity was almost the same or less than that by treatment with pretilachlor alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenclorim alone increased GST activity in roots of rice seedlings by 43-52%.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
fenclorim treatment alonee1
Outcome
GST activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
43–52e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e1

“by fenclorim treatment alone, the GST activity was 43–52 and 33–45% increased in roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–1980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenclorim alone increased GST activity in shoots of rice seedlings by 33-45%.

Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
fenclorim treatment alonee1
Outcome
GST activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
33–45%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e1

“by fenclorim treatment alone, the GST activity was 43–52 and 33–45% increased in roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–1980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of pretilachlor and fenclorim increased GST activity in shoots by 73-126%, more than either alone.

Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
combination treatment of pretilachlor and fenclorime2
Outcome
GST activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
73–126%e1
Comparator
treatment of pretilachlor or fenclorim alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e1

“the GST activity was increased 73–126% in shoots and 101–139% in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2074–2144 · show in text ↑
e2

“By the combination treatment of pretilachlor and fenclorim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2014–2072 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared with treatment of pretilachlor or fenclorim alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of pretilachlor and fenclorim increased GST activity in roots by 101-139%, more than either alone.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
combination treatment of pretilachlor and fenclorime2
Outcome
GST activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
101–139%e1
Comparator
treatment of pretilachlor or fenclorim alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e1

“the GST activity was increased 73–126% in shoots and 101–139% in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2074–2144 · show in text ↑
e2

“By the combination treatment of pretilachlor and fenclorim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2014–2072 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared with treatment of pretilachlor or fenclorim alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dymron showed less effect than fenclorim in increasing GST activity.

Treatment
dymrone1
Outcome
GST activitye1
Direction
less effecte1
Comparator
fenclorime1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e1

“It was found that dymron showed less effect in increasing the GST activity than fenclorim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2259–2348 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fenclorim and dymron may act through different mechanisms of safening against pretilachlor injury.

Outcome
safening effectse1
Qualifier
different mechanismse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the growth of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) seedlings against pretilachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–210 · show in text ↑
e1

“fenclorim and dymron may have different mechanisms of safening effects on the protection of rice seedlings against pretilachlor injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2736 · show in text ↑

Fenclorim · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Fenclorim · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.