Paper · 1972 · Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology

COMPARATIVE CYTOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF THE PESTICIDES MENAZON, METROBROMURON AND TETRACHLOROISOPHTHALONITRILE INHORDEUMANDTRADESCANTIA

D. J. Tomkins; W. F. Grant

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The biological effects of an s-triazine insecticide: menazon (MEN), a substituted urea herbicide: metobromuron (PAT) and an aromatic hydrocarbon fungicide: tetrachloroisophthalonitrile (DAC) were compared with those of ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS) and X-irradiation. Seeds of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were soaked in solutions of the chemicals before determining percentage germination, seedling height and frequency of chromosomal aberrations. In addition, somatic mutations in inflorescences of Tradescantia clone 02 treated with solutions of the chemicals were counted. X-rays induced a high frequency of chromosome breaks but had no effect on any other character. In contrast, EMS had a pronounced effect on all the characters studied. Only one pesticide, PAT, had significant effects. The herbicide reduced germination percentage, seedling height and the mitotic index in barley. It is concluded that EMS and X-rays have a cytogenetic action in the treated cells, whereas PAT induced a severe physiological effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X-rays induced frequent chromosome breaks in treated plant cells.

Treatment
X-rayse0
Outcome
chromosome breakse0
Direction
high frequencye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“X-rays induced a high frequency of chromosome breaks but had no effect on any other character”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seeds of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X-rays did not affect other measured characters.

Treatment
X-rayse0
Outcome
any other charactere0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“X-rays induced a high frequency of chromosome breaks but had no effect on any other character”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seeds of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EMS markedly affected all studied characters.

Treatment
EMSe0
Outcome
all the characters studiede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EMS had a pronounced effect on all the characters studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–739 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seeds of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Among pesticides, only PAT had significant effects.

Treatment
PATe0
Outcome
effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only one pesticide, PAT, had significant effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seeds of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAT reduced barley germination percentage and seedling height.

Treatment
herbicidee0
Outcome
germination percentage, seedling heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicide reduced germination percentage, seedling height and the mitotic index in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAT reduced the barley mitotic index.

Treatment
herbicidee0
Outcome
mitotic indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicide reduced germination percentage, seedling height and the mitotic index in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–884 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 8 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

herbicide · cytology · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.