Paper · 2011 · Weed Technology

Weed Management in a Furrow-Irrigated Imidazolinone-Resistant Hybrid Rice Production System

Jason K. Norsworthy; Robert C. Scott; Sanjeev K. Bangarwa; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Research was conducted in 2007 and 2008 to evaluate weed-control options in an imazethapyr-resistant rice production system. Raised beds were formed, and imidazolinone-resistant hybrid rice ‘CL 730’ was drill-seeded on beds. Five herbicide programs applied up to the four- to six-leaf stage of rice were evaluated with and without additional “as-needed” herbicide at later stages. All the herbicide combinations and as-needed herbicides tested in this research were labeled for rice, and only minor transient injury (< 5%) was initially observed. Weeds emerged throughout the growing season, and as-needed herbicides were applied after the four- to six-leaf stage of rice to control these late-emerging weeds and weeds not effectively controlled with earlier applications, primarily Palmer amaranth. Most of the Palmer amaranth at this site was insensitive to imazethapyr (possibly acetolactate synthase resistant). Therefore, application of as-needed herbicides with different modes of action, such as 2,4-D, were used to improve Palmer amaranth control. Rice yields were often numerically higher in plots that received additional herbicide after the six-leaf stage of rice, but yields were not significantly improved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The labeled herbicide combinations caused only minor transient rice injury below 5%.

Treatment
herbicide combinations and as-needed herbicidese0
Outcome
minor transient injurye0
Direction
minore0
Value
< 5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the herbicide combinations and as-needed herbicides tested in this research were labeled for rice, and only minor transient injury (< 5%) was initially observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–546 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds emerged throughout the rice growing season.

Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
Weeds emerged throughout the growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds emerged throughout the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most Palmer amaranth at the site was insensitive to imazethapyr.

Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth at this site was insensitive to imazethapyre0
Qualifier
possibly acetolactate synthase resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the Palmer amaranth at this site was insensitive to imazethapyr (possibly acetolactate synthase resistant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional herbicides with different modes of action improved Palmer amaranth control.

Treatment
as-needed herbicides with different modes of actione0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of as-needed herbicides with different modes of action, such as 2,4-D, were used to improve Palmer amaranth control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional herbicide after the six-leaf stage often raised rice yields numerically, without significant improvement.

Treatment
additional herbicide after the six-leaf stage of ricee0
Outcome
Rice yieldse0
Direction
numerically highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yields were often numerically higher in plots that received additional herbicide after the six-leaf stage of rice, but yields were not significantly improved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1219 · show in text ↑

herbicide · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 10 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.