Paper · 1975 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Total and Soluble Nitrogen in Douglas Fir in Relation to Plant Nitrogen Status

R. Van Den Driessche; J. E. Webber

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Concentrations of total N, ninhydrin-positive compounds, and monosubstituted guanidino compounds were determined in current and 1-year-old foliage and twigs, and in roots of 3-year-old Douglas fir (Pseudotsugamenziesii (Mirb.) Franco.). These plants were grown in a trial where levels of N (0, 255, and 675 kg N/ha), and sources of N (nitrate, ammonium, and urea) had been applied factorially. N fertilizer treatment increased soluble N levels by as much as 19 times control values, whereas total N was increased at most 40%. Total N in 1-year-old foliage, current twigs, and roots, and guanidino compounds in 1-year-old twigs were consistently different for different N treatment levels. Sixty percent of the variance in plant size measurements could be explained by six N measurements, including total N, in multiple regression.In a second experiment, concentrations of arginine and proline, in addition to concentrations of ninhydrin-positive compounds, guanidino compounds, and total N, were determined in foliage of 3-year-old Douglas fir grown in growth chambers at 10 and 21 °C. Four provenances, to which three moisture-stress treatments were factorially applied, were represented at each temperature. Concentration of soluble N compounds was higher at 21 °C than at 10 °C, but not concentration of total N. Moisture stress increased concentration of soluble N compounds, in particular proline, and there were some differences between provenances in concentrations of soluble N compounds and total N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer increased soluble N up to 19 times control values.

Taxon
Douglas FirPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
N fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
soluble N levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19 timese0
Comparator
control valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer treatment increased soluble N levels by as much as 19 times control values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer increased total N at most 40%.

Taxon
Douglas FirPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Outcome
total Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total N was increased at most 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N in one-year foliage, current twigs and roots differed across N treatments.

Taxon
Douglas FirPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Organ / stage
1-year-old foliage, current twigs, and rootse0
Treatment
N treatment levelse0
Outcome
Total Ne0
Direction
differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N in 1-year-old foliage, current twigs, and roots, and guanidino compounds in 1-year-old twigs were consistently different for different N treatment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guanidino compounds in one-year twigs differed across N treatments.

Taxon
Douglas FirPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Organ / stage
1-year-old twigse0
Treatment
N treatment levelse0
Outcome
guanidino compoundse0
Direction
differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guanidino compounds in 1-year-old twigs were consistently different for different N treatment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six N measurements explained 60% of variance in plant size.

Taxon
Douglas FirPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Compound
total Ne0
Outcome
variance in plant size measurementse0
Value
Sixty percente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sixty percent of the variance in plant size measurements could be explained by six N measurements, including total N, in multiple regression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble N compounds were higher at 21 °C than 10 °C.

Taxon
Douglas FirPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
21 °Ce0
Outcome
Concentration of soluble N compoundse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
10 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentration of soluble N compounds was higher at 21 °C than at 10 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N concentration was not higher at 21 °C than 10 °C.

Taxon
Douglas FirPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
21 °Ce0
Outcome
concentration of total Ne0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
10 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentration of soluble N compounds was higher at 21 °C than at 10 °C, but not concentration of total N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress increased soluble N compounds, particularly proline.

Taxon
Douglas FirPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
Moisture stresse0
Outcome
concentration of soluble N compounds, in particular prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture stress increased concentration of soluble N compounds, in particular proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Provenances differed in soluble N compound and total N concentrations.

Taxon
Douglas FirPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Material
provenancese0
Outcome
concentrations of soluble N compounds and total Ne0
Direction
differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were some differences between provenances in concentrations of soluble N compounds and total N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.