Paper · 2014 · The Scientific World JOURNAL

Identification of Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) Self-Incompatibility

Fan Wang; Feng-Jiao Zhang; Fa-Di Chen; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There has been a heated argument over self-incompatibilityof chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) among chrysanthemum breeders. In order to solve the argument, we investigated pistil receptivity, seed set, and compatible index of 24 chrysanthemum cultivars. It was found that the 24 cultivars averagely had 3.7-36.3 pollen grains germinating on stigmas at 24 hours after self-pollination through the fluorescence microscope using aniline blue staining method. However, only 10 of them produced self-pollinated seeds, and their seed sets and compatible indexes were 0.03-56.50% and 0.04-87.50, respectively. The cultivar "Q10-33-1" had the highest seed set (56.50%) and compatible index (87.50), but ten of its progeny had a wide range of separation in seed set (0-37.23%) and compatible index (0-68.65). The results indicated that most of chrysanthemum cultivars were self-incompatible, while a small proportion of cultivars were self-compatible. In addition, there is a comprehensive separation of self-incompatibility among progeny from the same self-pollinated self-compatible chrysanthemum cultivar. Therefore, it is better to emasculate inflorescences during chrysanthemum hybridization breeding when no information concerning its self-incompatibility characteristics is available. However, if it is self-incompatible and propagated by vegetative methods, it is unnecessary to carry out emasculation when it is used as a female plant during hybridization breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 24 cultivars averaged 3.7-36.3 pollen grains germinating on stigmas after self-pollination.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
pollen grains germinating on stigmase0
Value
3.7-36.3 pollen grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 24 cultivars averagely had 3.7-36.3 pollen grains germinating on stigmas at 24 hours after self-pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only ten cultivars produced self-pollinated seeds.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
produced self-pollinated seedse0
Value
10e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 10 of them produced self-pollinated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed set among self-fertile cultivars ranged from 0.03 to 56.50%.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
seed setse0
Value
0.03-56.50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their seed sets and compatible indexes were 0.03-56.50% and 0.04-87.50, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compatibility indexes ranged from 0.04 to 87.50.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
compatible indexese0
Value
0.04-87.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their seed sets and compatible indexes were 0.03-56.50% and 0.04-87.50, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Q10-33-1 had the highest seed set at 56.50%.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Q10-33-1e0
Outcome
seed sete0
Direction
higheste0
Value
56.50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar "Q10-33-1" had the highest seed set (56.50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Q10-33-1 had the highest compatibility index at 87.50.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Q10-33-1e1
Outcome
compatible indexe0
Direction
higheste1
Value
87.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and compatible index (87.50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cultivar "Q10-33-1" had the highest seed set (56.50%) and compatible index (87.50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–697 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten Q10-33-1 progeny varied in seed set from 0 to 37.23%.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Q10-33-1e1
Outcome
seed sete0
Value
0-37.23%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ten of its progeny had a wide range of separation in seed set (0-37.23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cultivar "Q10-33-1" had the highest seed set (56.50%) and compatible index (87.50), but ten of its progeny had a wide range of separation in seed set (0-37.23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Q10-33-1 progeny varied in compatibility index from 0 to 68.65.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Q10-33-1e1
Outcome
compatible indexe0
Value
0-68.65e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compatible index (0-68.65)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cultivar "Q10-33-1" had the highest seed set (56.50%) and compatible index (87.50), but ten of its progeny had a wide range of separation in seed set (0-37.23%) and compatible index (0-68.65)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–806 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most chrysanthemum cultivars were self-incompatible.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Outcome
self-incompatiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of chrysanthemum cultivars were self-incompatible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–889 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A small proportion of chrysanthemum cultivars were self-compatible.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
self-compatiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a small proportion of cultivars were self-compatible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Breeders should emasculate chrysanthemum inflorescences when incompatibility is unknown.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Outcome
emasculate inflorescencese0
Qualifier
when no information concerning its self-incompatibility characteristics is availablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is better to emasculate inflorescences during chrysanthemum hybridization breeding when no information concerning its self-incompatibility characteristics is available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1289 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Emasculation is unnecessary for a vegetatively propagated self-incompatible female parent.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
unnecessary to carry out emasculatione0
Qualifier
if it is self-incompatible and propagated by vegetative methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if it is self-incompatible and propagated by vegetative methods, it is unnecessary to carry out emasculation when it is used as a female plant during hybridization breeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–58 · show in text ↑