Paper · 2013 · BMC Plant Biology

Selective defoliation affects plant growth, fruit transcriptional ripening program and flavonoid metabolism in grapevine

Chiara Pastore; Sara Zenoni; Marianna Fasoli; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
151
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The selective removal of grapevine leaves around berry clusters can improve the quality of ripening fruits by influencing parameters such as the berry sugar and anthocyanin content at harvest. The outcome depends strongly on the timing of defoliation, which influences the source-sink balance and the modified microclimate surrounding the berries. We removed the basal leaves from Vitis vinifera L. cv Sangiovese shoots at the pre-bloom and veraison stages, and investigated responses such as shoot growth, fruit morphology and composition compared to untreated controls. Moreover, we performed a genome-wide expression analysis to explore the impact of these defoliation treatments on berry transcriptome. RESULTS: We found that pre-bloom defoliation improved berry quality traits such as sugar and anthocyanin content, whereas defoliation at veraison had a detrimental effect, e.g. less anthocyanin and higher incidence of sunburn damage. Genome-wide expression analysis during berry ripening revealed that defoliation at either stage resulted in major transcriptome reprogramming, which slightly delayed the onset of ripening. However, a closer investigation of individual gene expression profiles identified genes that were specifically modulated by defoliation at each stage, reflecting the uncoupling of metabolic processes such as flavonoid biosynthesis, cell wall and stress metabolism, from the general ripening program. CONCLUSIONS: The specific transcriptional modifications we observed following defoliation at different time points allow the identification of the developmental or metabolic processes affected in berries thus deepening the knowledge of the mechanisms by which these agronomical practices impact the final berry ripening traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-bloom defoliation improved berry sugar and anthocyanin content.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Sangioveset0
Treatment
pre-bloom defoliatione0
Outcome
sugar and anthocyanin contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-bloom defoliation improved berry quality traits such as sugar and anthocyanin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Veraison defoliation reduced anthocyanin content.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
defoliation at veraisone0
Outcome
anthocyanine0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“defoliation at veraison had a detrimental effect, e.g. less anthocyanin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Veraison defoliation increased sunburn damage.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
defoliation at veraisone0
Outcome
incidence of sunburn damagee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“defoliation at veraison had a detrimental effect, e.g. less anthocyanin and higher incidence of sunburn damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at either stage caused major berry transcriptome reprogramming.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
defoliation at either stagee0
Outcome
transcriptome reprogramminge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“defoliation at either stage resulted in major transcriptome reprogramming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at either stage slightly delayed onset of ripening.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
defoliation at either stagee0
Outcome
onset of ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“defoliation at either stage resulted in major transcriptome reprogramming, which slightly delayed the onset of ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–424 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at each stage specifically modulated genes linked to flavonoid biosynthesis, cell wall and stress metabolism.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
defoliation at each stagee0
Outcome
genes that were specifically modulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genes that were specifically modulated by defoliation at each stage, reflecting the uncoupling of metabolic processes such as flavonoid biosynthesis, cell wall and stress metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–424 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

pruning · quality: postharvest · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

pruning · disease · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.