Paper · 1977 · Physiologia Plantarum

Influence of Phytohormones on the Response of Cultured Cotton Ovules to (2‐chloroethyl)phosphonic Acid

JAMES McD. STEWART; CECILIA LEE HSU

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Callus was induced from the micropylar end of cultured cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) ovules by (2‐chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (CEPA). The influence of other phytohormones on the growth of this callus was examined with in vitro culture techniques. Abscisic acid inhibited the callus growth induced by 10 −4 M CEPA, but at low concentrations of abscisic acid and CEPA, callus growth was stimulated slightly. Indoleacetic acid inhibited the callus growth at optimum CEPA concentration, but not when the CEPA level was supraoptimum. Kinetin stimulated micropylar callus growth when ovules were obtained from parent plants grown under long, warm days but not when ovules were from plants grown under short days and cooler temperatures. Gibberellic acid (GA) caused the greatest callus response. Increasing concentrations of GA up to 5 × 10 −7 M markedly stimulated callus growth while increasing the sensitivity of the tissue to CEPA. In addition to induction and growth of the micropylar callus, combinations of CEPA and GA caused a complete release of normal tissue differentiation in the cotton ovule with rapid proliferation of the entire ovule integument. This is a promising system with which to study hormonal control of tissue differentiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEPA induced callus from the micropylar end of cotton ovules.

Organ / stage
ovulese0
Treatment
(2‐chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (CEPA)e0
Outcome
Calluse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Callus was induced from the micropylar end of cultured cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) ovules by (2‐chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (CEPA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid inhibited CEPA-induced callus growth.

Treatment
Abscisic acide0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
10 −4 M CEPAe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Abscisic acid inhibited the callus growth induced by 10 −4 M CEPA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low abscisic acid and CEPA stimulated callus growth slightly.

Treatment
low concentrations of abscisic acid and CEPAe0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at low concentrations of abscisic acid and CEPA, callus growth was stimulated slightly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoleacetic acid inhibited callus growth at optimal CEPA.

Treatment
Indoleacetic acide0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
optimum CEPA concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indoleacetic acid inhibited the callus growth at optimum CEPA concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoleacetic acid did not inhibit growth at supraoptimal CEPA.

Treatment
Indoleacetic acide0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Qualifier
CEPA level was supraoptimume0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indoleacetic acid inhibited the callus growth at optimum CEPA concentration, but not when the CEPA level was supraoptimum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin stimulated callus growth in ovules from long, warm day plants.

Treatment
Kinetine0
Outcome
micropylar callus growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
long, warm dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetin stimulated micropylar callus growth when ovules were obtained from parent plants grown under long, warm days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin did not stimulate callus growth in ovules from short, cool day plants.

Outcome
ovulese0
Qualifier
short days and cooler temperaturese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not when ovules were from plants grown under short days and cooler temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA caused the greatest callus response.

Treatment
Gibberellic acid (GA)e0
Outcome
callus responsee0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gibberellic acid (GA) caused the greatest callus response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing GA up to 5 × 10 −7 M stimulated callus growth.

Treatment
GA up to 5 × 10 −7 Me0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing concentrations of GA up to 5 × 10 −7 M markedly stimulated callus growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA increased tissue sensitivity to CEPA.

Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
sensitivity of the tissue to CEPAe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing concentrations of GA up to 5 × 10 −7 M markedly stimulated callus growth while increasing the sensitivity of the tissue to CEPA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEPA plus GA induced proliferation across the ovule integument.

Treatment
combinations of CEPA and GAe0
Outcome
rapid proliferation of the entire ovule integumente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combinations of CEPA and GA caused a complete release of normal tissue differentiation in the cotton ovule with rapid proliferation of the entire ovule integument.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1166 · show in text ↑

indole-3-acetic acid · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.