Paper · 1983 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Performance of Goats and Lambs Fed Corn Silage Produced on Sludge‐Amended Soil

R. H. Dowdy; B. J. Bray; R. D. Goodrich; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract An animal feeding study was conducted to measure the effects of feeding corn ( Zea mays L.) silage grown on sludge‐amended vs. conventionally fertilized soil on the performance of dairy goats ( Capra hircus ) and market lambs ( Ovis aries ). Annual applications of 0, 15, 30, and 45 Mg/ha of sewage sludge (105–186 mg Cd/kg) produced corn silage that contained high levels of bioaccumulated Cd (5.26 mg/kg, year III). Zinc accumulated in the silage to a lesser extent, which resulted in undesirably low Zn/Cd ratios. In vitro digestible dry matter, cell wall constituents, acid detergent fiber and lignin, and silica accumulation were not affected by sludge fertilization. Dry matter intake, daily milk production, and feed efficiency of dairy goats were not affected by 3 y of continuous consumption of high Cd silage. Market lambs fed sludge‐fertilized corn silage tended ( P < 0.05, year II) to have higher daily gains than did those fed control silage, whereas feed efficiency (kilograms gain ÷ kilograms feed) was not affected by sludge fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge amendment produced corn silage with high cadmium accumulation.

Treatment
sewage sludgee0
Outcome
bioaccumulated Cde0
Direction
high levelse0
Value
5.26 mg/kge0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Annual applications of 0, 15, 30, and 45 Mg/ha of sewage sludge (105–186 mg Cd/kg) produced corn silage that contained high levels of bioaccumulated Cd (5.26 mg/kg, year III).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–426 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc accumulated less than cadmium in silage, producing low zinc to cadmium ratios.

Outcome
Zn/Cd ratiose0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc accumulated in the silage to a lesser extent, which resulted in undesirably low Zn/Cd ratios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge fertilization did not affect in vitro digestible dry matter or measured fiber and silica properties.

Treatment
sludge fertilizatione0
Outcome
In vitro digestible dry matter, cell wall constituents, acid detergent fiber and lignin, and silica accumulatione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro digestible dry matter, cell wall constituents, acid detergent fiber and lignin, and silica accumulation were not affected by sludge fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

fertilization · cytology · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.