Paper · 2001 · International Journal of Pest Management

Effect of primary inoculum sources of bean common bacterial blight on early epidemics, seed yield and quality aspects

C. Fininsa; T. Tefera

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of primary inoculum sources of Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli from infected seed, infested debris and soil on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) was studied in Ethiopia during the 1997 and 1998 cropping seasons. The inoculum sources initiated common bacterial blight (CBB) and influenced incidence and severity during early epidemics. The incidence, assessed at flowering in 1997 from beans grown on infested debris-inoculated plots, was higher by 59% than on beans from the treated seed plots. CBB on beans from untreated seed-planted and infested debris-inoculated plots was more severe than on beans from infested soil-inoculated plots. Bean seed yield and quality aspects were also influenced by the inoculum sources. Lower seedling emergence, stand count and seed yield were obtained from infested debris- and soil-inoculated plots. Seeds harvested from plots planted with treated seeds had the lowest proportion of discoloured seeds. Discoloured seeds were on average 5.3?26.4% lighter than normal seeds. Management options that highly reduce CBB primary inoculum should be promoted. Keywords: Primary Inoculum SourcesXanthomnas Campestris Pv PhaseoliPhaseolus VulgarisCommon Bacterial Blight Epidemics

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The primary inoculum sources initiated common bacterial blight and influenced incidence and severity during early epidemics in bean.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
inoculum sourcese0
Outcome
incidence and severitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“bean common bacterial blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculum sources initiated common bacterial blight (CBB) and influenced incidence and severity during early epidemics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CBB incidence at flowering in 1997 was 59% higher on beans from infested debris-inoculated plots than on beans from treated seed plots.

Taxon
beanse0
Treatment
infested debris-inoculated plotse0
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
highere0
Value
59%e0
Qualifier
assessed at flowering in 1997e0
Comparator
treated seed plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence, assessed at flowering in 1997 from beans grown on infested debris-inoculated plots, was higher by 59% than on beans from the treated seed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CBB was more severe on beans from untreated-seed and infested-debris plots than on beans from infested-soil plots.

Taxon
beanse0
Treatment
untreated seed-planted and infested debris-inoculated plotse0
Outcome
CBBe0
Direction
more severee0
Comparator
infested soil-inoculated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“CBB on beans from untreated seed-planted and infested debris-inoculated plots was more severe than on beans from infested soil-inoculated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean seed yield and quality aspects were influenced by the inoculum sources.

Taxon
Beane0
Treatment
inoculum sourcese0
Outcome
seed yield and quality aspectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Bean seed yield and quality aspects were also influenced by the inoculum sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling emergence, stand count and seed yield were lower on infested debris- and soil-inoculated plots.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
infested debris- and soil-inoculated plotse0
Outcome
seedling emergence, stand count and seed yielde0
Direction
Lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean common bacterial blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lower seedling emergence, stand count and seed yield were obtained from infested debris- and soil-inoculated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots planted with treated seeds produced the lowest proportion of discoloured seeds.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
plots planted with treated seedse0
Outcome
proportion of discoloured seedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean common bacterial blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seeds harvested from plots planted with treated seeds had the lowest proportion of discoloured seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Discoloured seeds were on average 5.3 to 26.4% lighter than normal seeds.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
lighter than normal seedse0
Value
5.3?26.4%e0
Comparator
normal seedse0

Verbatim

t0

“bean common bacterial blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Discoloured seeds were on average 5.3?26.4% lighter than normal seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1023 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Management options that strongly reduce primary CBB inoculum should be promoted.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
Management options that highly reduce CBB primary inoculume0

Verbatim

t0

“bean common bacterial blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Management options that highly reduce CBB primary inoculum should be promoted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1102 · show in text ↑

infection · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

infection · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.