Paper · 1996 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Fungicidal control of ascochyta blight of field pea

T. D. Warkentin; K. Y. Rashid; A. G. Xue

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The use of fungicides for the control of ascochyta blight in field pea was investigated. Four fungicides were applied to the cultivars AC Tamor and Radley at two locations in Manitoba in 1993 and 1994. Fungicides were applied either once, twice, or three times at 10-d intervals, beginning at the initiation of flowering. Chlorothalonil and benomyl were effective m reducing the severity of ascochyta blight and increasing the yield and seed weight of field pea. The triple application of chlorothalonil resulted in a mean yield increase of 33% over that of the untreated control. Iprodione and propiconazole were relatively ineffective in controlling ascochyta blight. The percentage of seedborne ascochyta was not significantly affected by fungicide treatments. The severity of ascochyta blight was greater in 1993 that in 1994, resulting in greater benefits of chlorothalonil and benomyl applications in 1993. Key words: Field pea, Pisum sativum L., ascochyta blight, Mycosphaerella pinodes, fungicide

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorothalonil reduced ascochyta blight severity in field pea.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
Chlorothalonile0
Outcome
severity of ascochyta blighte0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorothalonil and benomyl were effective m reducing the severity of ascochyta blight and increasing the yield and seed weight of field pea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl reduced ascochyta blight severity in field pea.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
benomyle0
Outcome
severity of ascochyta blighte0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorothalonil and benomyl were effective m reducing the severity of ascochyta blight and increasing the yield and seed weight of field pea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorothalonil increased yield and seed weight of field pea.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
Chlorothalonile0
Outcome
yield and seed weighte0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorothalonil and benomyl were effective m reducing the severity of ascochyta blight and increasing the yield and seed weight of field pea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl increased yield and seed weight of field pea.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
benomyle0
Outcome
yield and seed weighte0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorothalonil and benomyl were effective m reducing the severity of ascochyta blight and increasing the yield and seed weight of field pea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple chlorothalonil application increased mean field pea yield by 33% over untreated control.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
triple application of chlorothalonile0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The triple application of chlorothalonil resulted in a mean yield increase of 33% over that of the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione was relatively ineffective against ascochyta blight.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
Iprodionee0
Outcome
controlling ascochyta blighte0
Direction
relatively ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Iprodione and propiconazole were relatively ineffective in controlling ascochyta blight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole was relatively ineffective against ascochyta blight.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
propiconazolee0
Outcome
controlling ascochyta blighte0
Direction
relatively ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Iprodione and propiconazole were relatively ineffective in controlling ascochyta blight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatments did not significantly affect seedborne ascochyta percentage.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
fungicide treatmentse0
Outcome
percentage of seedborne ascochytae0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of seedborne ascochyta was not significantly affected by fungicide treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascochyta blight severity was greater in 1993 than 1994.

Taxon
field peat0
Outcome
severity of ascochyta blighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
1994e0
Setting
1993e0

Verbatim

e0

“The severity of ascochyta blight was greater in 1993 that in 1994”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorothalonil and benomyl had greater benefits in 1993.

Taxon
field peat0
Outcome
greater benefitse0
Direction
greatere0
Setting
1993e0

Verbatim

e0

“greater benefits of chlorothalonil and benomyl applications in 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑

propiconazole · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chlorothalonil · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

benomyl · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.