Paper · 1997 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

The profit potential of soybean production rotation systems in Arkansas

C. R. Dillon; T. C. Keisling; R. D. Riggs; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this study was to provide agronomic, nematode, and economic analysis of alternative production rotation systems for soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) on a silt loam soil association in Arkansas. Monocropped soybeans and soybeans double‐cropped with wheat (Triocum aestivam L.) was included as well as grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) under dryland conditions in order to reduce soybean cyst nematode (SCN, Heteroderaglycine Ichinohe) populations. A total of seven crop rotations and eleven treatments that included alternative tillage conditions and wheat stubble management practices were analyzed using data from 1980–1984 experiments conducted at the Arkansas Cotton Branch Experiment Station on a silt loam Loring‐Calloway‐Henry Association (Alfisols). Although crop rotation was effective for nematode suppression, yields for double‐cropped soybeans were comparable to soybean yields under monocropped’ continuous management practices. Economic results indicated that average net returns of $338.50 per hectare (about $ 137 per acre) were highest for the continuous double‐cropped wheat‐soybean production management systems which combine the conventional tillage method with burning of wheat stubble. For the conditions analyzed and level of SCN present, this research provides evidence that control of the soybean cyst nematode through rotation practices that utilize grain sorghum is not economically efficient where continuous double‐cropped wheat‐soybeans systems can be incorporated. Notes Corresponding author.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation was effective in suppressing soybean cyst nematode.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
crop rotatione1
Interactor
soybean cyst nematodeHeterodera glycinese2pest
Outcome
nematode suppressione1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The profit potential of soybean production rotation systems in Arkansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although crop rotation was effective for nematode suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–851 · show in text ↑
e2

“in order to reduce soybean cyst nematode (SCN, Heteroderaglycine Ichinohe) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields of double-cropped soybeans were comparable to those of monocropped soybeans.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
double‐cropped soybeanse3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Comparator
monocroppede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The profit potential of soybean production rotation systems in Arkansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“yields for double‐cropped soybeans were comparable to soybean yields under monocropped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The continuous double-cropped wheat-soybean system with conventional tillage and burning of wheat stubble had the highest average net returns ($338.50 per hectare).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional tillage method with burning of wheat stubblee5
Outcome
average net returnse4
Direction
higheste4
Value
$338.50 per hectaree4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The profit potential of soybean production rotation systems in Arkansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“Economic results indicated that average net returns of $338.50 per hectare (about $ 137 per acre) were highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1084 · show in text ↑
e5

“which combine the conventional tillage method with burning of wheat stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cyst nematode control through grain sorghum rotation is not economically efficient under the conditions analyzed.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
rotation practices that utilize grain sorghume6
Interactor
soybean cyst nematodeHeterodera glycinese2pest
Outcome
control of the soybean cyst nematodee6
Direction
not economically efficiente6
Qualifier
For the conditions analyzed and level of SCN presente6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · InteractorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The profit potential of soybean production rotation systems in Arkansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“in order to reduce soybean cyst nematode (SCN, Heteroderaglycine Ichinohe) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–478 · show in text ↑
e6

“For the conditions analyzed and level of SCN present, this research provides evidence that control of the soybean cyst nematode through rotation practices that utilize grain sorghum is not economically efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1451 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 36 positive, 21 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fire · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

rotation · Heterodera glycines · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.