Paper · 2008 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Sugarcane Response to Nitrogen Fertilization on a Histosol with Shallow Water Table and Periodic Flooding

B. Glaz; S. T. Reed; J. P. Albano

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) is increasingly exposed to periodic floods and shallow water tables on Histosols in Florida’s Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA). In the past, when these soils were usually well drained, they provided excess N for sugarcane through microbial oxidation. It is not known if supplemental N would now improve yields because microbial oxidation is reduced by shallow water tables and periodic floods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of N fertilizer rates on two sugarcane cultivars exposed to a 25‐cm water‐table depth with and without repeated 2‐day floods. Two studies were planted in containers in 2001 and 2002 with two sugarcane cultivars and five equally spaced rates of N fertilizer from 0 to 200 kg ha −1 . Leaf, stalk and root weights were reduced by periodic flooding and the magnitude of the reduction sometimes differed between cultivars. Plant weights, leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) and leaf N content were often highest near an N rate of 100 kg ha −1 . Usually, N fertilizer rate did not interact with water treatment. Nitrogen fertilization may be useful for sugarcane exposed to water‐table depths of 25 cm with and without 2‐day repeated floods on EAA Histosols.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Periodic flooding reduced leaf, stalk and root weights of sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
periodic floodinge1
Outcome
Leaf, stalk and root weightse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf, stalk and root weights were reduced by periodic flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant weights, leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) and leaf N content of sugarcane were often highest near an N rate of 100 kg ha −1.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
N ratee3
Outcome
Plant weights, leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) and leaf N contente3
Direction
higheste3
Qualifier
oftene3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant weights, leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) and leaf N content were often highest near an N rate of 100 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1020 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer rate did not interact with water treatment in sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
N fertilizer ratee4
Outcome
interacte4
Comparator
water treatmente4

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e4

“N fertilizer rate did not interact with water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1087 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude of flood-related reduction in sugarcane sometimes differed between the two cultivars.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
two sugarcane cultivarse6
Outcome
magnitude of the reductione2
Direction
differede2
Qualifier
sometimese2

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e2

“the magnitude of the reduction sometimes differed between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–903 · show in text ↑
e6

“with two sugarcane cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–697 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization may be useful for sugarcane exposed to shallow water tables and periodic floods.

Taxon
sugarcanee5
Outcome
Nitrogen fertilizatione5

Verbatim

e5

“Nitrogen fertilization may be useful for sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1139 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.