Paper · 1986 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Effect of applied nitrogen, increased inoculation, broadcast lime, and seed pelleting on establishment of Lotus pedunculatus cv. ‘Grasslands Maku’ in tussock grasslands

M. E. Wedderburn

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Two series of trials examined methods of improving the poor establishment of ‘Grasslands Maku’ lotus in acid tussock grassland. At four sites (pH 4.4–5.1), increasing rates of fertiliser nitrogen (0–30 kg N/ha) at sowing, and increasing inoculation rate were investigated. At a further two sites (pH 4.6, 5.1), the effects of 5× and 10× the recommended inoculation rate, broadcast lime (at 500 kg/ha), and pelleting seed with rock phosphate/dolomite were evaluated. Nitrogen reduced plant weight and nodule number at three sites in the first year, and reduced second year plant production where vegetation cover was dense. The reduction in establishment was probably caused by nitrogen inhibiting nodulation, together with competition from resident vegetation. Addition of nitrogen at sowing to Maku lotus in the field should be avoided. Increasing the recommended inoculation rate increased establishment, by improving nodulation, winter survival, individual plant growth, and overall production. Broadcast lime improved nodulation at pH 4.6, but not at pH 5.1. However, total production was increased at both sites. The nodulation response to pelleting was similar to that for broadcast lime at low pH (4.6), but the lime effect was less than that obtained with increased inoculation and was lost by the second year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen reduced plant weight and nodule number at three sites in the first year.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Treatment
Nitrogene0
Outcome
plant weight and nodule numbere0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at three sites in the first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen reduced plant weight and nodule number at three sites in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen reduced second year production where vegetation cover was dense.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Treatment
Nitrogene1
Outcome
second year plant productione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
where vegetation cover was densee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced second year plant production where vegetation cover was dense.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen reduced plant weight and nodule number at three sites in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–555 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen probably reduced establishment by inhibiting nodulation and increasing competition.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
reduction in establishmente0
Qualifier
inhibiting nodulation, together with competition from resident vegetatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in establishment was probably caused by nitrogen inhibiting nodulation, together with competition from resident vegetation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend avoiding nitrogen at sowing for field Maku lotus.

Taxon
Maku lotuse0
Outcome
Addition of nitrogen at sowing to Maku lotus in the field should be avoidede0

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of nitrogen at sowing to Maku lotus in the field should be avoided.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing inoculation rate increased establishment.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Treatment
Increasing the recommended inoculation ratee0
Outcome
establishmente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
recommended inoculation ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the recommended inoculation rate increased establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher inoculation improved nodulation, winter survival, plant growth and production.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Treatment
Increasing the recommended inoculation ratee1
Outcome
nodulation, winter survival, individual plant growth, and overall productione0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
recommended inoculation ratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by improving nodulation, winter survival, individual plant growth, and overall production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the recommended inoculation rate increased establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast lime improved nodulation at pH 4.6.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Treatment
Broadcast limee0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
at pH 4.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadcast lime improved nodulation at pH 4.6, but not at pH 5.1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast lime did not improve nodulation at pH 5.1.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Treatment
Broadcast limee0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
note0
Qualifier
at pH 5.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadcast lime improved nodulation at pH 4.6, but not at pH 5.1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast lime increased total production at both sites.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Treatment
Broadcast limee1
Outcome
total productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total production was increased at both sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Broadcast lime improved nodulation at pH 4.6, but not at pH 5.1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pelleting had a nodulation response similar to broadcast lime at pH 4.6.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Treatment
pelletinge0
Outcome
nodulation responsee0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
at low pH (4.6)e0
Comparator
broadcast limee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nodulation response to pelleting was similar to that for broadcast lime at low pH (4.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lime effect was weaker than increased inoculation and disappeared by year two.

Taxon
Lotus pedunculatusLotus pedunculatust0
Outcome
lime effecte0
Direction
less thane0
Qualifier
lost by the second yeare0
Comparator
increased inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus pedunculatus
Lotus pedunculatus · TaxonMimi und Ruebi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lime effect was less than that obtained with increased inoculation and was lost by the second year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lotus pedunculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–124 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Lotus pedunculatusPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · symbiosis · Lotus pedunculatusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · symbiosis · Lotus pedunculatusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

transplanting · symbiosis · Lotus pedunculatusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Lotus pedunculatusResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Lotus pedunculatusResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.