Paper · 2008 · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Role of Nitric Oxide Dependence on Nitric Oxide Synthase‐like Activity in the Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling

Gang‐Ping Hao; Yu Xing; Jian‐Hua Zhang

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
98
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) has been known as an important signal in plant antioxidative defense but its production and roles in water stress are less known. The present study investigated whether NO dependence on a NO synthase-like (NOS) activity is involved in the signaling of drought-induced protective responses in maize seedlings.NOS activity, rate of NO release and drought responses were analyzed when NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP), NO scavenger c-PTIO (2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide) and NOS inhibitor L-NAME (NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester) were applied to both detached maize leaves and whole plants. Both NOS activity and the rate of NO release increased substantially under dehydration stress. The high NOS activity induced by c-PTIO as NO scavenger and NO accumulation inhibited by NOS inhibitor L-NAME in dehydration-treated maize seedlings indicated that most NO production under water deficit stress may be generated from NOS-like activity. After dehydration stress for 3 h, detached maize leaves pretreated with NO donor SNP maintained more water content than that of control leaves pretreated with water. This result was consistent with the decrease in the transpiration rate of SNP-treated leaves subjected to drought treatment for 3 h. Membrane permeability, a cell injury index, was lower in SNP-treated maize leaves under dehydration stress for 4 h when compared with the control leaves. Also, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity of SNP combined drought treatment maize leaves was higher than that of drought treatment alone, indicating that exogenous NO treatment alleviated the water loss and oxidative damage of maize leaves under water deficit stress. When c-PTIO as a specific NO scavenger was applied, the effects of applied SNP were overridden. Treatment with L-NAME on leaves also led to higher membrane permeability, higher transpiration rate and lower SOD activities than those of control leaves, indicating that NOS-like activity was involved in the antioxidative defense under water stress. These results suggested that NO dependence on NOS-like activity serves as a signaling component in the induction of protective responses and is associated with drought tolerance in maize seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NOS activity and the rate of NO release in maize increased under dehydration stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
dehydration stresse0
Outcome
NOS activity and the rate of NO releasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both NOS activity and the rate of NO release increased substantially under dehydration stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–739 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most NO production under water deficit stress may be generated from NOS-like activity in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
water deficit stresse7
Outcome
most NO productione7
Qualifier
generated from NOS-like activitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e7

“most NO production under water deficit stress may be generated from NOS-like activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detached maize leaves pretreated with the NO donor SNP maintained more water content than control leaves after 3 h of dehydration stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
NO donor SNPe1
Outcome
water contente1
Direction
maintained moree1
Qualifier
dehydration stress for 3 he1
Comparator
control leaves pretreated with watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“After dehydration stress for 3 h, detached maize leaves pretreated with NO donor SNP maintained more water content than that of control leaves pretreated with water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration rate of SNP-treated maize leaves decreased under 3 h of drought treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SNPe2
Outcome
transpiration ratee2
Direction
decreasee2
Qualifier
drought treatment for 3 he2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e2

“the decrease in the transpiration rate of SNP-treated leaves subjected to drought treatment for 3 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Membrane permeability was lower in SNP-treated maize leaves than in control leaves under 4 h of dehydration stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SNPe3
Outcome
Membrane permeabilitye3
Direction
lowere3
Qualifier
dehydration stress for 4 he3
Comparator
control leavese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e3

“Membrane permeability, a cell injury index, was lower in SNP-treated maize leaves under dehydration stress for 4 h when compared with the control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD activity of maize leaves under SNP plus drought was higher than under drought alone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SNPe4
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
drought treatment alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e4

“superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity of SNP combined drought treatment maize leaves was higher than that of drought treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NO scavenger c-PTIO overrode the effects of applied SNP in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
c-PTIOe5
Outcome
effects of applied SNPe5
Direction
overriddene5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e5

“When c-PTIO as a specific NO scavenger was applied, the effects of applied SNP were overridden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L-NAME on maize leaves led to higher membrane permeability than control leaves.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
L-NAMEe6
Outcome
membrane permeabilitye6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
control leavese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e6

“Treatment with L-NAME on leaves also led to higher membrane permeability, higher transpiration rate and lower SOD activities than those of control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L-NAME on maize leaves led to higher transpiration rate than control leaves.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
L-NAMEe6
Outcome
transpiration ratee6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
control leavese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e6

“Treatment with L-NAME on leaves also led to higher membrane permeability, higher transpiration rate and lower SOD activities than those of control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L-NAME on maize leaves led to lower SOD activity than control leaves.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
L-NAMEe6
Outcome
SOD activitiese6
Direction
lowere6
Comparator
control leavese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e6

“Treatment with L-NAME on leaves also led to higher membrane permeability, higher transpiration rate and lower SOD activities than those of control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1962 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NO dependence on NOS-like activity is suggested to serve as a signaling component in the induction of protective responses in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
induction of protective responsese1
Qualifier
NO dependence on NOS-like activity serves as a signaling componente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Stress Signaling of Maize Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“NO dependence on NOS-like activity serves as a signaling component in the induction of protective responses and is associated with drought tolerance in maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2089–2256 · show in text ↑

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

N(gamma)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

N(gamma)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.