Paper · 2010 · American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Sugarcane Response to Water-Deficit Stress during Early Growth on Organic and Sand Soils

Zhao

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
87
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Problem statement: Approximately 20% of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is grown on sand soils in south Florida, USA. Sugarcane yields in the region linearly increased in last 33 years on organic (muck) soils, but not on sand soils. Water deficit during the formative growth phase on sand soils probably limits sugarcane yields. Approach: A greenhouse study was conducted in 2009 and 2010 to evaluate the physiological and growth responses of sugarcane to water-deficit stress during formative growth. Treatments included organic (muck) and sand soils and two water regimes Well Watered (WW) and Water-Deficit Stress (WS). Sugarcane cultivar CP 80-1743 was planted in pots and fertilized with N, P and K based on soil analyses. All pots were well watered until 58 days after planting, when water was withheld from the WS pots. During the WS treatment, plant growth rate, leaf Relative Water Content (RWC), proline content and photosynthesis components were measured. Final tillers, Green Leaf Area (GLA) and shoot biomass were determined 27 (in 2009) or 22 (in 2010) days after initiating the WS treatment. Results: Stress symptoms of sugarcane plants appeared 7-10 days earlier on sand soil than on muck soil. Water stress reduced stomatal conductance (gs), Photosystem II Photochemical Efficiency (PSII), leaf Photosynthesis rate (Pn), the number of tillers and GLA, resulting in reduced shoot biomass, especially on sand soil. Neither leaf RWC nor proline content was a sensitive WS indicator. Conclusion: Nondestructive measurements of physiological traits of gs, PSII and Pn during the formative stage may be useful for early detection of water stress in sugarcane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress symptoms appeared 7-10 days earlier on sand than muck soil.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
Stress symptomse0
Direction
earliere0
Value
7-10 dayse0
Comparator
muck soile0
Setting
sand soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Stress symptoms of sugarcane plants appeared 7-10 days earlier on sand soil than on muck soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced stomatal conductance, PSII efficiency, and photosynthesis.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs), Photosystem II Photochemical Efficiency (PSII), leaf Photosynthesis rate (Pn)e0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
especially on sand soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress reduced stomatal conductance (gs), Photosystem II Photochemical Efficiency (PSII), leaf Photosynthesis rate (Pn), the number of tillers and GLA, resulting in reduced shoot biomass, especially on sand soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced tiller number and green leaf area.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
the number of tillers and GLAe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress reduced stomatal conductance (gs), Photosystem II Photochemical Efficiency (PSII), leaf Photosynthesis rate (Pn), the number of tillers and GLA, resulting in reduced shoot biomass, especially on sand soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced shoot biomass, especially on sand soil.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
especially on sand soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress reduced stomatal conductance (gs), Photosystem II Photochemical Efficiency (PSII), leaf Photosynthesis rate (Pn), the number of tillers and GLA, resulting in reduced shoot biomass, especially on sand soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf relative water content was not a sensitive indicator of water stress.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
leaf RWCe0
Direction
Neithere0

Verbatim

e0

“Neither leaf RWC nor proline content was a sensitive WS indicator.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content was not a sensitive indicator of water stress.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
Neithere0

Verbatim

e0

“Neither leaf RWC nor proline content was a sensitive WS indicator.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest gs, PSII, and Pn measurements for early water-stress detection.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
formative stagee0
Outcome
early detection of water stresse0

Verbatim

e0

“Nondestructive measurements of physiological traits of gs, PSII and Pn during the formative stage may be useful for early detection of water stress in sugarcane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1665 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 4 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

drought · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 7 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.