Paper · 2010 · Agronomy Journal

Competitive Interactions between Cultivated and Red Rice as a Function of Recent and Projected Increases in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

Lewis H. Ziska; Martha B. Tomecek; David R. Gealy

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
85
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Because wild lines of the same species often represent a weedy constraint to cultivated crops in the field, any differential response to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, [CO 2 ], may alter weed–crop competition and seed yield. We evaluated the growth and reproduction of cultivated rice ( Oryza sativa L.; Clearfield, CL161) and red or weedy rice (Stuttgart, StgS) in monoculture, and at two competitive densities (8 and 16 plants m −2 ) using [CO 2 ] that corresponded to the 1940s, current levels, and that projected for the middle for the current century (300, 400, and 500 μmol mol −1 , respectively). Competition was determined using plant relative yield (PRY) for biomass and seed yield as a function of [CO 2 ]. At maturity, PRY significantly increased for wild rice, but decreased for the cultivated line as a function of competitive density. Increases in [CO 2 ] resulted in significant decreases in the PRY of seed yield at both competitive densities for CL161; while significant increases in seed yield and aboveground biomass were noted for StgS, but only at the higher competitive density. In addition, the relative increase in seed yield for CL161–StgS, determined at the same competitive density, increased as a function of [CO 2 ] suggesting a greater amount of seed rain from the weedy rice. Overall, these are the first data to indicate that for rice, weedy lines may have been favored as a function of rising carbon dioxide, with greater relative impact on the seed yield and biomass of cultivated rice lines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant relative yield of wild rice increased with competitive density.

Treatment
competitive densitye1
Interactor
wild riceOryzeaee1weed
Outcome
PRYe1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competitive Interactions between Cultivated and Red Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, PRY significantly increased for wild rice, but decreased for the cultivated line as a function of competitive density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–858 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant relative yield of the cultivated rice line decreased with competitive density.

Material
cultivated linee1
Treatment
competitive densitye1
Outcome
PRYe1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competitive Interactions between Cultivated and Red Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, PRY significantly increased for wild rice, but decreased for the cultivated line as a function of competitive density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rising CO2 significantly decreased the plant relative yield of seed for cultivated rice CL161 at both competitive densities.

Material
CL161e2
Treatment
Increases in [CO 2 ]e2
Outcome
PRY of seed yielde2
Direction
decreasese2
Qualifier
at both competitive densitiese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competitive Interactions between Cultivated and Red Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increases in [CO 2 ] resulted in significant decreases in the PRY of seed yield at both competitive densities for CL161”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–979 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy rice StgS increased seed yield and aboveground biomass at the higher competitive density.

Material
StgSe3
Treatment
higher competitive densitye3
Interactor
StgSe3weed
Outcome
seed yield and aboveground biomasse3
Direction
increasese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competitive Interactions between Cultivated and Red Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e3

“while significant increases in seed yield and aboveground biomass were noted for StgS, but only at the higher competitive density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1110 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative seed yield increase of the CL161–StgS mixture rose with CO2, suggesting more seed rain from the weedy rice.

Material
CL161–StgSe4
Treatment
[CO 2 ]e4
Interactor
weedy ricee4weed
Outcome
relative increase in seed yield for CL161–StgSe4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
suggesting a greater amount of seed rain from the weedy ricee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competitive Interactions between Cultivated and Red Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e4

“the relative increase in seed yield for CL161–StgS, determined at the same competitive density, increased as a function of [CO 2 ] suggesting a greater amount of seed rain from the weedy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1316 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy rice lines may have been favored by rising carbon dioxide, with a greater relative impact on seed yield and biomass of cultivated rice lines.

Treatment
rising carbon dioxidee5
Interactor
weedy linese5weed
Outcome
seed yield and biomass of cultivated rice linese5
Direction
greatere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competitive Interactions between Cultivated and Red Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e5

“Overall, these are the first data to indicate that for rice, weedy lines may have been favored as a function of rising carbon dioxide, with greater relative impact on the seed yield and biomass of cultivated rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1536 · show in text ↑

co2 · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 131 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.