Paper · 2007 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Yield components of nodulated cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and maize (Zea mays) plants grown with exogenous phosphorus in different cropping systems

Patrick A. Ndakidemi; Felix D. Dakora

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A 2-factorial experiment, involving three levels of phosphorus (0, 40, and 80 kg/ha) and four cropping systems (mono crop, maize–cowpea inter-row, maize–cowpea intra-row, and maize–cowpea intra-hole cropping) was conducted in the field for two consecutive years in 2003 and 2004 at Nietvoorbij (33°54'S, 18°14'E), Stellenbosch, South Africa. Plant density (number of plants per hectare) was 166 666 for sole cowpea, 111 111 for maize–cowpea inter-row, 55 555 for maize–cowpea intra-row and 55 555 for maize–cowpea intra-hole cropping. Applying 40 or 80 kg phosphorus (P)/ha significantly increased cowpea grain yields by 59–65% in 2003 and 44–55% in 2004. With maize, the increases in grain yield were 20–37% in 2003 and 48–55% in 2004 relative to the zero-P control. In both cropping seasons, the number of pod-bearing peduncles per plant, the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, and grain yield per cowpea plant were significantly increased with the application of exogenous P. In contrast, the number of pod-bearing peduncles per plant, the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, and the grain yield per plant were all significantly depressed by mixed culture relative to mono crop cowpea. There was also a significant interactive effect of P and cropping system on cowpea, such that, all cowpea yield components were generally lower in intercrop relative to mono crop. In all instances, the yield component of mono crop cowpea and, to some extent, inter-row cowpea, were markedly increased by the provision of 40 or 80 kg P/ha relative to the zero-P control. Intercropping maize with cowpea produced higher total yields per unit land area than the mono crop counterpart.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield increased 20–37% in 2003 relative to zero P.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
40, and 80 kg/hae1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
20–37%e0
Qualifier
2003e0
Comparator
zero-P controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With maize, the increases in grain yield were 20–37% in 2003 and 48–55% in 2004 relative to the zero-P control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“three levels of phosphorus (0, 40, and 80 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield increased 48–55% in 2004 relative to zero P.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
40, and 80 kg/hae1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
48–55%e0
Qualifier
2004e0
Comparator
zero-P controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With maize, the increases in grain yield were 20–37% in 2003 and 48–55% in 2004 relative to the zero-P control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“three levels of phosphorus (0, 40, and 80 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed culture significantly reduced cowpea pod-bearing peduncles, pods and seeds per pod relative to monoculture.

Treatment
mixed culturee0
Interactor
maizeZea mayst0other
Outcome
the number of pod-bearing peduncles per plant, the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pode0
Direction
depressede0
Comparator
mono crop cowpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of pod-bearing peduncles per plant, the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, and the grain yield per plant were all significantly depressed by mixed culture relative to mono crop cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed culture significantly reduced grain yield per cowpea plant relative to monoculture.

Treatment
mixed culturee0
Interactor
maizeZea mayst0other
Outcome
grain yield per plante0
Direction
depressede0
Comparator
mono crop cowpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield per plant were all significantly depressed by mixed culture relative to mono crop cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus and cropping system interacted significantly for cowpea yield components, which were generally lower in intercrops.

Treatment
P and cropping systeme0
Outcome
all cowpea yield componentse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
mono crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant interactive effect of P and cropping system on cowpea, such that, all cowpea yield components were generally lower in intercrop relative to mono crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components of monocrop cowpea increased markedly with 40 or 80 kg P/ha.

Treatment
40 or 80 kg P/hae0
Outcome
yield component of mono crop cowpeae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
zero-P controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield component of mono crop cowpea and, to some extent, inter-row cowpea, were markedly increased by the provision of 40 or 80 kg P/ha relative to the zero-P control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components of inter-row cowpea increased to some extent with 40 or 80 kg P/ha.

Treatment
40 or 80 kg P/hae0
Interactor
maizeZea mayst0other
Outcome
inter-row cowpeae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
to some extente0
Comparator
zero-P controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield component of mono crop cowpea and, to some extent, inter-row cowpea, were markedly increased by the provision of 40 or 80 kg P/ha relative to the zero-P control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize-cowpea intercropping produced higher total yield per unit area than monocropping.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Intercropping maize with cowpeae0
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
total yields per unit land areae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mono crop counterparte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping maize with cowpea produced higher total yields per unit land area than the mono crop counterpart.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1709 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.