Paper · 1984 · Photochemistry and Photobiology

INDEPENDENT EFFECTS OF PHYTOCHROME AND NITRATE ON NITRATE REDUCTASE AND NITRITE REDUCTASE ACTIVITIES IN MAIZE

Arun Kumar Sharma; Sudhir K. Sopory

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
35
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract— Involvement of phytochrome in the regulation of nitrate reductase (NR) and nitrite reductase (NIR) activities in excised, etiolated leaves of Zea mays (L.) variety ‘Ganga‐5’ is demonstrated using low energy and high irradiance responses of phytochrome action. Photoreversibility by far‐red light of red light stimulated increases in NR and NIR activities was lost by 2 h. Red light given to the leaves, when induction by NO ‐ 3 , was saturated, further increased both enzyme activities. Even if red light was given 4–8 h before NO ‐ 3 , it still increased both NR and NIR activities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red photoreversibility of red-light stimulation of both reductase activities was lost by two hours.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Outcome
Photoreversibility by far‐red light of red light stimulated increases in NR and NIR activitiese0
Value
2 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photoreversibility by far‐red light of red light stimulated increases in NR and NIR activities was lost by 2 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–381 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves of Zea mays (L.) variety ‘Ganga‐5’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light further increased both reductase activities after nitrate induction was saturated.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
Red lighte0
Outcome
both enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
when induction by NO ‐ 3 , was saturatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red light given to the leaves, when induction by NO ‐ 3 , was saturated, further increased both enzyme activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–496 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves of Zea mays (L.) variety ‘Ganga‐5’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light given four to eight hours before nitrate increased both reductase activities.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
both NR and NIR activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
4–8 h before NO ‐ 3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even if red light was given 4–8 h before NO ‐ 3 , it still increased both NR and NIR activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–593 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves of Zea mays (L.) variety ‘Ganga‐5’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–183 · show in text ↑

light · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · physiology: enzyme activity · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.