Paper · 1975 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

Effect of transmission of exocortis dwarfing factors into Washington navel orange trees

MC Stannard; JC Evans; JK Long

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Washington navel orange trees on trifoliate orange rootstocks were inoculated at various ages with budwood from either severely dwarfed Washington navel trees with butt scaling caused by exocortis virus or moderately dwarfed Marsh grapefruit trees with no butt scaling. Dwarfing, measured by trunk girth, became apparent four seasons after inoculation, the butt scaling inoculum causing more pronounced dwarfing than the non-scaling inoculum. For both inocula, trees inoculated in the nursery were the most dwarfed, and yielded least, with trees inoculated in the field one, two, three or five years later being successively less dwarfed and high yielding. In a second experiment, Washington navel orange trees on trifoliate orange, which were carrying exocortis virus or were inoculated with it either in the nursery or later in the field, were planted in 1962 at a density of 835 ha-1. The field inoculated trees subsequently grew larger than the others. All were more dwarfed but yielded more heavily on a ground area basis during five years of cropping than exocortis-free trees planted at a normal density of 222 ha-1. Dwarfed trees developed butt scaling symptoms and periodically became unthrifty. The non-scaling form of dwarfing lends itself to the development of high density plantings of small trees with consequent benefits in management and high early production

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated trees showed dwarfing by trunk girth four seasons after inoculation.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treest0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
trunk girthe0
Direction
Dwarfinge0
Qualifier
four seasons after inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Dwarfing, measured by trunk girth, became apparent four seasons after inoculation, the butt scaling inoculum causing more pronounced dwarfing than the non-scaling inoculum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Washington navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butt scaling inoculum caused more dwarfing than non-scaling inoculum.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treest0
Treatment
butt scaling inoculume0
Outcome
dwarfinge0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
non-scaling inoculume0

Verbatim

e0

“the butt scaling inoculum causing more pronounced dwarfing than the non-scaling inoculum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Washington navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For both inocula, nursery inoculation produced the greatest dwarfing compared with later field inoculation.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treest0
Treatment
inoculated in the nurserye0
Outcome
dwarfede0
Direction
most dwarfede0
Comparator
inoculated in the fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“For both inocula, trees inoculated in the nursery were the most dwarfed, and yielded least, with trees inoculated in the field one, two, three or five years later being successively less dwarfed and high yielding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Washington navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For both inocula, nursery inoculation yielded least compared with later field inoculation.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treest0
Treatment
inoculated in the nurserye0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
inoculated in the fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“For both inocula, trees inoculated in the nursery were the most dwarfed, and yielded least, with trees inoculated in the field one, two, three or five years later being successively less dwarfed and high yielding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Washington navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field inoculated trees grew larger than trees infected or inoculated earlier.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treest0
Treatment
field inoculatede0
Outcome
grewe0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
the otherse0

Verbatim

e0

“The field inoculated trees subsequently grew larger than the others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Washington navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dense exocortis affected plantings had more dwarfing than normal density exocortis free plantings.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treest0
Treatment
Alle0
Outcome
dwarfede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
exocortis-free trees planted at a normal density of 222 ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“All were more dwarfed but yielded more heavily on a ground area basis during five years of cropping than exocortis-free trees planted at a normal density of 222 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Washington navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dense exocortis affected plantings yielded more per ground area than normal density exocortis free plantings.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treest0
Treatment
Alle0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
more heavilye0
Qualifier
during five years of croppinge0
Comparator
exocortis-free trees planted at a normal density of 222 ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“All were more dwarfed but yielded more heavily on a ground area basis during five years of cropping than exocortis-free trees planted at a normal density of 222 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Washington navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dwarfed trees developed butt scaling and periodically became unthrifty.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treest0
Outcome
butt scaling symptoms and periodically became unthriftye0

Verbatim

e0

“Dwarfed trees developed butt scaling symptoms and periodically became unthrifty.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Washington navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider non-scaling dwarfing suitable for dense plantings with management and early production benefits.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treest0
Outcome
high density plantings of small treese0

Verbatim

e0

“The non-scaling form of dwarfing lends itself to the development of high density plantings of small trees with consequent benefits in management and high early production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Washington navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–87 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.