Paper · 2010 · South African Journal of Plant and Soil

Effect of nitrogen levels and sources on production of Swiss Chard (Beta vulgarisvar.Cicla)

G.M. Engelbrecht; G.M. Ceronio; P.C. Motseki

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To optimise the production of Swiss chard, high levels of nitrogen fertiliser are often applied. This may have adverse effects on both the economy of fertilisation and the nutritional value of the human diet. Very little is known about both the optimum levels and influence of different sources of nitrogen on this crop under South African conditions. Glasshouse experiments were therefore conducted to determine the integrated effects of nitrogen level and source on the yield and quality of Swiss chard. Three Swiss chard seedlings were planted in each 4 L pot and later thinned to one plant per pot. Nine nitrogen levels (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 kg ha-~ N) and six nitrogen sources (ammonium nitrate, calcium nitrate, potassium nitrate, ammonium sulphate, urea ammonium nitrate and urea) were combined in a factorial arrangement with four replications. The number of leaves harvested, leaf area, fresh and dry leaf mass, and leaf nitrogen content increased with increasing nitrogen levels up to 800 kg ha-~ N. Dry leaf mass was significantly higher where urea was applied compared to calcium nitrate. Although the different nitrogen sources did not differ significantly at the corresponding application levels, the nitrate accumulation within Swiss chard leaves was significantly increased with the use of ammonium nitrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number, leaf area, and fresh leaf mass increased with nitrogen level up to 800 kg ha-~ N.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen levels up to 800 kg ha-~ Ne0
Outcome
number of leaves harvested, leaf area, freshe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of leaves harvested, leaf area, fresh and dry leaf mass, and leaf nitrogen content increased with increasing nitrogen levels up to 800 kg ha-~ N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry leaf mass and leaf nitrogen content increased with nitrogen level up to 800 kg ha-~ N.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen levels up to 800 kg ha-~ Ne0
Outcome
dry leaf mass, and leaf nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of leaves harvested, leaf area, fresh and dry leaf mass, and leaf nitrogen content increased with increasing nitrogen levels up to 800 kg ha-~ N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea produced significantly higher dry leaf mass than calcium nitrate.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
Dry leaf masse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
calcium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry leaf mass was significantly higher where urea was applied compared to calcium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen sources did not differ significantly at corresponding application levels.

Treatment
different nitrogen sourcese0
Outcome
did not differ significantlye0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
corresponding application levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the different nitrogen sources did not differ significantly at the corresponding application levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate significantly increased nitrate accumulation in Swiss chard leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
nitrate accumulation within Swiss chard leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrate accumulation within Swiss chard leaves was significantly increased with the use of ammonium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1346 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.