Paper · 2003 · Phytopathology

Strawberry Plant Extracts Stimulate Secondary Conidiation by Colletotrichum acutatum on Symptomless Leaves

L. F. S. Leandro; M. L. Gleason; F. W. Nutter; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Conidial suspensions of Colletotrichum acutatum were prepared in 1:27, 1:45, and 1:81 (wt/vol) dilutions of an extract of strawberry (cv. Tristar) flowers or leaves in water. Strawberry leaves and plastic coverslips were sprayed with the conidial suspensions, incubated at 25 degrees C and continuous wetness for 48 h, and the number of conidia and appressoria were counted. In another experiment, leaves and coverslips were sprayed with a conidial suspension in water, incubated for 72 h to establish C. acutatum populations, and placed in a growth chamber under dry conditions for up to 6 weeks. At each sampling time, leaves and coverslips were sprayed with flower extracts, leaf extracts, or water, incubated for 48 h at 25 degrees C and continuous wetness, and the number of conidia and appressoria were counted. Flower extracts significantly (P </= 0.05) increased the number of conidia on leaves and coverslips compared with water, both when conidia were applied with the extracts and when the extracts were applied to C. acutatum populations exposed to dryness for up to 2 weeks. Application of flower extracts resulted in up to 10- and 16-fold increases in conidia on leaves and coverslips, respectively. Number of conidia increased more when exposed to flower extracts than to leaf extracts. Production of appressoria was not significantly affected by flower or leaf extracts. Our results suggest that inoculum levels of C. acutatum on foliage may increase during flowering of strawberry plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower extracts significantly increased conidia on leaves and coverslips versus water.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Tristare0
Treatment
Flower extractse1
Outcome
number of conidiae1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry (cv. Tristar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–155 · show in text ↑
e1

“Flower extracts significantly (P </= 0.05) increased the number of conidia on leaves and coverslips compared with water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower extract increased conidia on leaves up to tenfold.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
flower extractse1
Outcome
conidia on leavese1
Direction
increasese1
Value
10-e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 184–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of flower extracts resulted in up to 10- and 16-fold increases in conidia on leaves and coverslips, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower extract increased conidia on coverslips up to sixteenfold.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
flower extractse1
Outcome
conidia on leaves and coverslipse1
Direction
increasese1
Value
16-folde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 184–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of flower extracts resulted in up to 10- and 16-fold increases in conidia on leaves and coverslips, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower extracts increased conidia more than leaf extracts.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
flower extractse1
Outcome
Number of conidiae1
Direction
increased moree1
Comparator
leaf extractse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 184–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Number of conidia increased more when exposed to flower extracts than to leaf extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower and leaf extracts did not significantly affect appressoria production.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
flower or leaf extractse1
Outcome
Production of appressoriae1
Direction
not significantly affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 184–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Production of appressoria was not significantly affected by flower or leaf extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1394 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest pathogen inoculum on foliage may increase during strawberry flowering.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
C. acutatumColletotrichum acutatume0pathogen
Outcome
inoculum levels of C. acutatume0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum acutatum
Colletotrichum acutatum · InteractorRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculum levels of C. acutatum on foliage may increase during flowering of strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1513 · show in text ↑

botanical · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.