Paper · 2012 · Systematic Botany

Systematics of the Sphagnum fimbriatum Complex: Phylogenetic Relationships, Morphological Variation, and Allopolyploidy

A. Jonathan Shaw; Kjell Ivar Flatberg; Peter Szövényi; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The application of genetic tools for studying species delimitation and relationships in Sphagnum (peatmosses) has demonstrated that evolutionary patterns are complex and include homoploid hybridization and multiple taxa of allopolyploid origin. We investigated evolutionary relationships in the so-called S. fimbriatum complex and tested hypotheses of species delimitation derived from patterns of morphological variation, and determined the origin of one species with diploid gametophytes. Plastid DNA sequences resolve a single haplotype shared by one described species, S. concinnum, and a morphotype that we had hypothesized to be another species (referred to informally as S. “diskoense”). All samples of the polyploid, S. tescorum, share an identical haplotype with most samples of S. girgensohnii. Sphagnum fimbriatum and S. girgensohnii share several plastid DNA haplotypes, and also share haplotypes with two other morphotypes that we had hypothesized to be distinct species (S. “obscurum” and S. “ubertum”). Fixed or nearly fixed heterozygosity at ten microsatellite loci show that S. tescorum is an allopolyploid. Genetic admixture analyses and computation of hybrid indices from microsatellite data, in combination with sequences from the plastid genome, support the hypothesis that S. fimbriatum and S. girgensohnii are progenitors of S. tescorum, with S. girgensohnii as the maternal parent. Data from 14 microsatellite loci demonstrate that S. concinnum, S. fimbriatum, S. girgensohnii, and S. tescorum are genetically distinct but the same data do not support separation of S. “diskoense,” S. “obscurum,” and S. “ubertum.” Homoploid hybridization between S. fimbriatum and S. girgensohnii is strongly suggested by genetic data and phylogenetic analyses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. concinnum and S. “diskoense” share a plastid haplotype.

Taxon
S. concinnumSphagnum concinnume0
Outcome
a single haplotype sharede0

Verbatim

e0

“a single haplotype shared by one described species, S. concinnum, and a morphotype that we had hypothesized to be another species (referred to informally as S. “diskoense”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. tescorum shares a haplotype with most S. girgensohnii.

Taxon
S. tescorumSphagnum tescorume0
Outcome
share an identical haplotypee0

Verbatim

e0

“All samples of the polyploid, S. tescorum, share an identical haplotype with most samples of S. girgensohnii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. fimbriatum and S. girgensohnii share several plastid haplotypes.

Taxon
Sphagnum fimbriatumSphagnum fimbriatume0
Outcome
share several plastid DNA haplotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum fimbriatum
Sphagnum fimbriatum · TaxonJiainmac · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sphagnum fimbriatum and S. girgensohnii share several plastid DNA haplotypes, and also share haplotypes with two other morphotypes that we had hypothesized to be distinct species (S. “obscurum” and S. “ubertum”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–1025 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterozygosity indicates S. tescorum is an allopolyploid.

Taxon
S. tescorumSphagnum tescorume0
Outcome
is an allopolyploide0

Verbatim

e0

“Fixed or nearly fixed heterozygosity at ten microsatellite loci show that S. tescorum is an allopolyploid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1132 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. fimbriatum and S. girgensohnii are supported as progenitors of S. tescorum.

Taxon
S. tescorumSphagnum tescorume0
Outcome
progenitors of S. tescorume0

Verbatim

e0

“support the hypothesis that S. fimbriatum and S. girgensohnii are progenitors of S. tescorum, with S. girgensohnii as the maternal parent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1413 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four named Sphagnum species are genetically distinct.

Taxon
S. concinnumSphagnum concinnume0
Outcome
genetically distincte0

Verbatim

e0

“S. concinnum, S. fimbriatum, S. girgensohnii, and S. tescorum are genetically distinct”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1551 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic data strongly suggest homoploid hybridization between S. fimbriatum and S. girgensohnii.

Taxon
S. fimbriatumSphagnum fimbriatume0
Outcome
Homoploid hybridizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum fimbriatum
Sphagnum fimbriatum · TaxonJiainmac · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Homoploid hybridization between S. fimbriatum and S. girgensohnii is strongly suggested by genetic data and phylogenetic analyses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1777 · show in text ↑