Paper · 1970 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Systematic Insecticides and Control of Insects and Mites on Beans12

G. T. Hagel

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Granular formulations of phorate, disulfoton, propoxur Dasanit® (O,O-diethyl O-[P- (methylsulfinyl) phenyl] phos-phorothioate), and aldicarb applied as systemic insecticides by 3 methods, in the seed furrow preplanting, broadcast on the soil preplanting, or sidedressed into the soil around established bean plants, were only partially effective in controlling Lygus elisus Van Duzee and L. hesperus Knight; the onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman; the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris); the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer); the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch; and several leafhopper species. Application of dimethoate as an emulsifiable spray to bean foliage was no more effective in controlling lygus bugs and the two-spotted spider mites than the application of systemic insecticides. Disulfoton, propoxur, and Dasanit applied as a preplanting broadcast at a rate of 3 lb/acre increased bean yield 100-200 lb/acre, but the yields were not significantly better than those in the check plots. Aldicarb reduced yields compared with the check when it was applied as a systemic at a rate of 3 lb/acre by any method. However no phytotoxicity was visible in the foliage or in the bean stand.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five granular systemic insecticides were only partly effective against named bean pests.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
systemic insecticidese0
Interactor
Lygus elisus Van DuzeeLygus elisuse0pest
Outcome
controlling Lygus elisus Van Duzee and L. hesperus Knight; the onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman; the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris); the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer); the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch; and several leafhopper speciese0
Direction
only partially effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lygus elisus
Lygus elisus · Interactor(c) Elliott Gordon, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Granular formulations of phorate, disulfoton, propoxur Dasanit® (O,O-diethyl O-[P- (methylsulfinyl) phenyl] phos-phorothioate), and aldicarb applied as systemic insecticides by 3 methods, in the seed furrow preplanting, broadcast on the soil preplanting, or sidedressed into the soil around established bean plants, were only partially effective in controlling Lygus elisus Van Duzee and L. hesperus Knight; the onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman; the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris); the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer); the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch; and several leafhopper species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar dimethoate controlled lygus bugs and spider mites no better than systemic insecticides.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
dimethoate as an emulsifiable spraye0
Interactor
lygus bugsLygus hesperuse0pest
Outcome
controlling lygus bugs and the two-spotted spider mitese0
Direction
no more effectivee0
Comparator
systemic insecticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lygus hesperus
Lygus hesperus · Interactorno rights reserved · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of dimethoate as an emulsifiable spray to bean foliage was no more effective in controlling lygus bugs and the two-spotted spider mites than the application of systemic insecticides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disulfoton increased bean yield by 100–200 lb/acre, without a significant difference from check plots.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Disulfotone0
Outcome
bean yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100-200 lb/acree0
Comparator
check plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Disulfoton, propoxur, and Dasanit applied as a preplanting broadcast at a rate of 3 lb/acre increased bean yield 100-200 lb/acre, but the yields were not significantly better than those in the check plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Propoxur increased bean yield by 100–200 lb/acre, without a significant difference from check plots.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
propoxure0
Outcome
bean yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100-200 lb/acree0
Comparator
check plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Disulfoton, propoxur, and Dasanit applied as a preplanting broadcast at a rate of 3 lb/acre increased bean yield 100-200 lb/acre, but the yields were not significantly better than those in the check plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dasanit increased bean yield by 100–200 lb/acre, without a significant difference from check plots.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Dasanite0
Outcome
bean yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100-200 lb/acree0
Comparator
check plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Disulfoton, propoxur, and Dasanit applied as a preplanting broadcast at a rate of 3 lb/acre increased bean yield 100-200 lb/acre, but the yields were not significantly better than those in the check plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb at 3 lb/acre reduced bean yield compared with the check under any application method.

Taxon
Beanst0
Treatment
Aldicarbe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
3 lb/acree0
Comparator
the checke0

Verbatim

e0

“Aldicarb reduced yields compared with the check when it was applied as a systemic at a rate of 3 lb/acre by any method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No visible phytotoxicity appeared in bean foliage or stand.

Taxon
beane0
Organ / stage
foliagee0
Outcome
no phytotoxicity was visiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“However no phytotoxicity was visible in the foliage or in the bean stand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1224 · show in text ↑

aldicarb · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.