Paper · 2012 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Recycling of Organic Wastes Amended with Trichoderma and Gluconacetobacter for Sustenance in Soil Health and Sugarcane Ratoon Yield in Udic Ustochrept

S. K. Shukla; P. N. Singh; R. S. Chauhan; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted with the objectives to relate the changes in the physical properties, soil organic carbon (SOC), nutrient availability, and uptake and output input ratios for sustaining sugarcane ratoon growth and yield in an Udic ustochrept. Eight combinations of trash and farmyard manure (FYM) with and without Trichoderma viride and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus were applied in two sugarcane ratoon (first and second ratoon in succession) crops. Application of Trichoderma-enriched trash showed the lowest bulk density (1.36 Mg m−3) and the greatest infiltration rate (4.5 mm h−1). Greater rate of increase in SOC was observed under inoculation of Trichoderma with FYM compared to trash mulch. The output/input ratios were greater in plots having trash-based treatments compared to FYM and inorganic fertilizers. Bioagent-inoculated FYM produced greater mean sugar yield (8.89 t ha−1) compared to bioagent-inoculated trash (7.97 t ha−1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma-enriched trash gave the lowest bulk density in sugarcane ratoon soil.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Trichoderma-enriched trashe1
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae1other
Outcome
bulk densitye1
Direction
loweste1
Value
1.36 Mg m−3e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sustaining sugarcane ratoon growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of Trichoderma-enriched trash showed the lowest bulk density (1.36 Mg m−3) and the greatest infiltration rate (4.5 mm h−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma-enriched trash gave the greatest infiltration rate in sugarcane ratoon soil.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Trichoderma-enriched trashe1
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae1other
Outcome
infiltration ratee1
Direction
greateste1
Value
4.5 mm h−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sustaining sugarcane ratoon growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of Trichoderma-enriched trash showed the lowest bulk density (1.36 Mg m−3) and the greatest infiltration rate (4.5 mm h−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma with FYM increased soil organic carbon more than trash mulch in sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
inoculation of Trichoderma with FYMe2
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae2other
Outcome
rate of increase in SOCe2
Direction
Greatere2
Comparator
trash mulche2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sustaining sugarcane ratoon growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–236 · show in text ↑
e2

“Greater rate of increase in SOC was observed under inoculation of Trichoderma with FYM compared to trash mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash-based treatments gave greater output/input ratios in sugarcane than FYM and inorganic fertilizers.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
trash-based treatmentse3
Outcome
output/input ratiose3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
FYM and inorganic fertilizerse3

Verbatim

e0

“sustaining sugarcane ratoon growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–236 · show in text ↑
e3

“The output/input ratios were greater in plots having trash-based treatments compared to FYM and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioagent-inoculated FYM gave a greater mean sugar yield than bioagent-inoculated trash in sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
bioagent-inoculated FYMe4
Outcome
mean sugar yielde4
Direction
greatere4
Value
8.89 t ha−1e4
Qualifier
7.97 t ha−1e4
Comparator
bioagent-inoculated trashe4

Verbatim

e0

“sustaining sugarcane ratoon growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–236 · show in text ↑
e4

“Bioagent-inoculated FYM produced greater mean sugar yield (8.89 t ha−1) compared to bioagent-inoculated trash (7.97 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–961 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

biocontrol · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.