Paper · 2003 · The Plant Cell

Disruption of theAtREV3Gene Causes Hypersensitivity to Ultraviolet B Light and γ-Rays in Arabidopsis: Implication of the Presence of a Translesion Synthesis Mechanism in Plants [W]

Ayako Sakamoto; Vo Thi Thuong Lan; Yoshihiro Hase; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
89
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To investigate UV light response mechanisms in higher plants, we isolated a UV light-sensitive mutant, rev3-1, in Arabidopsis. The root growth of rev3-1 was inhibited after UV-B irradiation under both light and dark conditions. We found that chromosome 1 of rev3-1 was broken at a minimum of three points, causing chromosome inversion and translocation. A gene disrupted by this rearrangement encoded the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase zeta (AtREV3), which is thought to be involved in translesion synthesis. The rev3-1 seedlings also were sensitive to gamma-rays and mitomycin C, which are known to inhibit DNA replication. Incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine after UV-B irradiation was less in rev3-1 than in the wild type. These results indicate that UV light-damaged DNA interrupted DNA replication in the rev3-1 mutant, leading to the inhibition of cell division and root elongation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B inhibited rev3-1 root growth under light and dark conditions.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
rev3-1e0
Treatment
UV-B irradiatione0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
under both light and dark conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root growth of rev3-1 was inhibited after UV-B irradiation under both light and dark conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rev3-1 chromosome 1 had at least three breaks causing inversion and translocation.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
rev3-1e0
Outcome
chromosome 1 of rev3-1 was brokene0
Value
a minimum of three pointse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chromosome 1 of rev3-1 was broken at a minimum of three points, causing chromosome inversion and translocation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disrupted gene encoded the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase zeta.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Gene
AtREV3e0
Outcome
encoded the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase zetae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A gene disrupted by this rearrangement encoded the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase zeta (AtREV3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rev3-1 seedlings were sensitive to gamma-rays.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
rev3-1e0
Treatment
gamma-rayse0
Outcome
sensitive to gamma-rayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rev3-1 seedlings also were sensitive to gamma-rays and mitomycin C, which are known to inhibit DNA replication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rev3-1 seedlings were sensitive to mitomycin C.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
rev3-1e0
Treatment
mitomycin Ce0
Outcome
sensitive to gamma-rays and mitomycin Ce0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rev3-1 seedlings also were sensitive to gamma-rays and mitomycin C, which are known to inhibit DNA replication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After UV-B, rev3-1 incorporated less bromodeoxyuridine than wild type.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
rev3-1e0
Treatment
UV-B irradiatione0
Outcome
Incorporation of bromodeoxyuridinee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
wild typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine after UV-B irradiation was less in rev3-1 than in the wild type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer damaged DNA interrupted replication in rev3-1, inhibiting division and root elongation.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
rev3-1e0
Outcome
inhibition of cell division and root elongatione0
Qualifier
UV light-damaged DNA interrupted DNA replicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV light-damaged DNA interrupted DNA replication in the rev3-1 mutant, leading to the inhibition of cell division and root elongation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑

uv · growth · ArabidopsisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.