Paper · 2000 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Mechanisms of adjustment by different pearl millet plant types to varying plant population densities

F. R. BIDINGER; D. S. RAJU

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pearl millet ( Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) is commonly grown at a wide range of plant population densities, both by design and as a consequence of stand establishment problems. High tillering genotypes are known to compensate effectively for lower plant population densities through their tillering capacity; less is known about the ability of naturally low tillering genotypes to adjust to low plant population densities. This is a particular concern in the case of the Iniadi landrace materials which are currently widely used in breeding programmes in both India and Africa. This research was done to determine how effectively the low tillering Iniadi types adjust to low plant population densities and how their mechanism(s) of adjustment compares to those of higher tillering materials. Two high and two low tillering genotypes were grown over a period of 5 years at plant population densities ranging from 12 to 2 plants/m 2 , under both high and low fertility regimes at the ICRISAT Centre, India. Both the high and low tillering types adjusted equally well to the reduced plant population densities, as judged by grain yield, but differed in their mechanism of adjustment. The high tillering genotypes adjusted, as expected, primarily by increasing productive tiller numbers, with only small changes in individual tiller productivity. The Iniadi genotypes increased productive tiller numbers in response to decreasing plant population densities to a limited degree, but increased panicle productivity to a much greater degree than the high tillering types. There was no differential effect on adjustment ability between the two types as a consequence of increased fertility, despite the stimulating effect of fertility on productive tiller numbers. The results are discussed in terms of generalized mechanisms of response to changing individual plant environmental resources (fertility and space), and in terms of the use of Iniadi germplasm in pearl millet breeding programmes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High and low tillering pearl millet types adjusted equally well in grain yield to reduced density.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
high and low tillering typese0
Treatment
reduced plant population densitiese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
equally welle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the high and low tillering types adjusted equally well to the reduced plant population densities, as judged by grain yield, but differed in their mechanism of adjustment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High tillering genotypes adjusted primarily through increased productive tiller numbers.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
high tillering genotypese0
Outcome
productive tiller numberse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high tillering genotypes adjusted, as expected, primarily by increasing productive tiller numbers, with only small changes in individual tiller productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual tiller productivity changed only slightly in high tillering genotypes.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
high tillering genotypese0
Outcome
individual tiller productivitye0
Direction
small changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high tillering genotypes adjusted, as expected, primarily by increasing productive tiller numbers, with only small changes in individual tiller productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iniadi genotypes increased productive tiller numbers only to a limited degree with decreasing density.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
Iniadi genotypese0
Treatment
decreasing plant population densitiese0
Outcome
productive tiller numberse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
to a limited degreee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Iniadi genotypes increased productive tiller numbers in response to decreasing plant population densities to a limited degree, but increased panicle productivity to a much greater degree than the high tillering types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iniadi genotypes increased panicle productivity more than high tillering types as density decreased.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
Iniadi genotypese0
Treatment
decreasing plant population densitiese0
Outcome
panicle productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
high tillering typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Iniadi genotypes increased productive tiller numbers in response to decreasing plant population densities to a limited degree, but increased panicle productivity to a much greater degree than the high tillering types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased fertility did not differentially affect adjustment ability between the types.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
increased fertilitye0
Outcome
adjustment abilitye0
Direction
no differential effecte0
Comparator
two typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no differential effect on adjustment ability between the two types as a consequence of increased fertility, despite the stimulating effect of fertility on productive tiller numbers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertility stimulated productive tiller numbers.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
increased fertilitye0
Outcome
productive tiller numberse0
Direction
stimulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no differential effect on adjustment ability between the two types as a consequence of increased fertility, despite the stimulating effect of fertility on productive tiller numbers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.