Paper · 2005 · Crop Science

Herbage Nitrogen Recovery in a Meadow and Loblolly Pine Alley

David M. Burner; Charles T. MacKown

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Herbage in conventional pasture and agroforestry systems is managed for microclimate and spatial differences inherent to these systems, but managers have scarce data on which to base their decisions. Our objective was to measure herbage N fertilizer recovery at two sites, an unshaded meadow and a shaded alley in 10‐yr‐old loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.). The test was conducted on a Leadvale silt loam soil (fine‐silty, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Typic Fragiudult) near Booneville, AR, in 2002 and 2003, with tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) the predominant herbage species. Fertilizer N was broadcast as split‐applications at six rates (100 kg ha −1 increments from 0 to 500 kg ha −1 yr −1 ). The meadow and pine alleys had sufficient herbage yield for rotational livestock production. Cumulative herbage yield (CHY) in the meadow was much more responsive to added N than pine alley herbage, but average cumulative fertilizer N (CFN) recoveries were only 38% and 12%, respectively. A shallow fragipan, low available soil P (≤ 6 μg g −1 ), depletion of soil water in July to September (both sites), and low solar irradiance (pine alley) were likely contributors to low fertilizer N recovery and herbage productivity. Because of poor herbage yield response and substantial accumulation of soil mineral N (62 to 237 kg ha −1 ) in pine alleys fertilized with ≥200 kg N ha −1 yr −1 , only maintenance levels of fertilizer N ( ≤ 100 kg ha −1 ) should be applied to similar sites. For these same reasons, yearly applications of fertilizer N > 300 kg ha −1 yr −1 are not recommended for meadows similar to the study site.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative herbage yield in the meadow responded much more strongly to added N than pine alley herbage.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
added Ne1
Outcome
Cumulative herbage yield (CHY)e1
Direction
more responsivee1
Comparator
pine alley herbagee1
Setting
meadowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) the predominant herbage species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cumulative herbage yield (CHY) in the meadow was much more responsive to added N than pine alley herbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average cumulative fertilizer N recovery in the meadow was 38%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
average cumulative fertilizer N (CFN) recoveriese2
Value
38%e2
Setting
meadowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) the predominant herbage species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cumulative herbage yield (CHY) in the meadow was much more responsive to added N than pine alley herbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–907 · show in text ↑
e2

“average cumulative fertilizer N (CFN) recoveries were only 38% and 12%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–997 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average cumulative fertilizer N recovery in the pine alley was 12%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
average cumulative fertilizer N (CFN) recoveriese2
Value
12%e2
Setting
pine alley herbagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) the predominant herbage species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cumulative herbage yield (CHY) in the meadow was much more responsive to added N than pine alley herbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–907 · show in text ↑
e2

“average cumulative fertilizer N (CFN) recoveries were only 38% and 12%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized pine alleys accumulated substantial soil mineral N.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
fertilized with ≥200 kg N ha −1 yr −1e3
Outcome
soil mineral Ne3
Direction
substantial accumulatione3
Value
62 to 237 kg ha −1e3
Setting
pine alleyse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) the predominant herbage species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–589 · show in text ↑
e3

“substantial accumulation of soil mineral N (62 to 237 kg ha −1) in pine alleys fertilized with ≥200 kg N ha −1 yr −1”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1276–1393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pine alleys fertilized at 200 kg N ha-1 yr-1 or more gave a poor herbage yield response.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
fertilized with ≥200 kg N ha −1 yr −1e4
Outcome
herbage yield responsee4
Direction
poore4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) the predominant herbage species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–589 · show in text ↑
e4

“Because of poor herbage yield response and substantial accumulation of soil mineral N (62 to 237 kg ha −1) in pine alleys fertilized with ≥200 kg N ha −1 yr −1, only maintenance levels of fertilizer N ( ≤ 100 kg ha −1 ) should be applied to similar sites”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1233–1489 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Only maintenance levels of fertilizer N (100 kg ha-1 or less) should be applied to similar sites.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
maintenance levels of fertilizer Ne4
Value
≤ 100 kg ha −1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) the predominant herbage species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–589 · show in text ↑
e4

“Because of poor herbage yield response and substantial accumulation of soil mineral N (62 to 237 kg ha −1) in pine alleys fertilized with ≥200 kg N ha −1 yr −1, only maintenance levels of fertilizer N ( ≤ 100 kg ha −1 ) should be applied to similar sites”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1233–1489 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Yearly fertilizer N above 300 kg ha-1 yr-1 is not recommended for meadows similar to the study site.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
yearly applications of fertilizer N > 300 kg ha −1 yr −1e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) the predominant herbage species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–589 · show in text ↑
e5

“yearly applications of fertilizer N > 300 kg ha −1 yr −1 are not recommended for meadows similar to the study site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1629 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A shallow fragipan and related soil and light conditions were likely contributors to low fertilizer N recovery and herbage productivity.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
low fertilizer N recovery and herbage productivitye6
Qualifier
shallow fragipane6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) the predominant herbage species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–589 · show in text ↑
e6

“A shallow fragipan, low available soil P (≤ 6 μg g −1), depletion of soil water in July to September (both sites), and low solar irradiance (pine alley) were likely contributors to low fertilizer N recovery and herbage productivity”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 999–1231 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.