Paper · 1993 · Agronomy Journal

Yield and Yield Component Response of Spring Barley to Fertilizer Nitrogen

Patrick Bulman; Donald L. Smith

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) is an important cereal crop in eastern Canada, where it is used mainly as a source of energy for monogastric animals. A 4‐yr field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of N application on the yield of spring barley. Three cultivars, Cadette, Leger (adapted feed types), and Argyle (unadapted malting type) were grown with 0, 50, 100, 150, or 200 kg N ha −1 applied as ammonium nitrate at seeding. Two other treatments consisted of 100 kg N ha −1 at seeding plus 50 kg N ha ‐1 as ammonium nitrate (broadcast) or urea (foliar spray) applied at Zadoks growth stage 50 (spike emergence). Grain yield generally did not respond to N treatments. Separate determination of main stem (MS) and tiller yield components revealed that the lack of response to progressively higher rates of N was due to the stable nature of MS yield components and to the relatively small contribution of tillers to grain yield. Very high levels of N occasionally reduced the grain set and yield of MS spikes. Mean weight per MS grain showed little variation among growing seasons and N treatments. High rates and split applications of N had few significant effects on tiller yield and yield components. Tiller spike densities were consistently low (81–147 spikes per square meter). Tiller spikes produced only 7 to 15 grains, with individual grains weighing 60 to 75% of the weight of MS grains. Previous cropping practices and environmental conditions seemed to affect spike development and grain‐set more than application of fertilizer N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield generally did not respond to nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
did not responde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield generally did not respond to N treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main stem yield components were stable with increasing nitrogen.

Treatment
progressively higher rates of Ne1
Outcome
MS yield componentse0
Direction
stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stable nature of MS yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“progressively higher rates of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillers contributed relatively little to grain yield.

Outcome
contribution of tillers to grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relatively small contribution of tillers to grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Very high nitrogen occasionally reduced main stem grain set and yield.

Treatment
Very high levels of Ne0
Outcome
grain set and yield of MS spikese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Very high levels of N occasionally reduced the grain set and yield of MS spikes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean weight per main stem grain varied little by season or nitrogen.

Outcome
Mean weight per MS graine0
Direction
little variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean weight per MS grain showed little variation among growing seasons and N treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High rates and split nitrogen had few significant effects on tiller yield components.

Treatment
High rates and split applications of Ne0
Outcome
tiller yield and yield componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High rates and split applications of N had few significant effects on tiller yield and yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiller spike density was consistently low.

Outcome
Tiller spike densitiese0
Direction
lowe0
Value
81–147 spikes per square metere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tiller spike densities were consistently low (81–147 spikes per square meter).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiller spikes produced 7 to 15 grains.

Outcome
grainse0
Value
7 to 15 grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tiller spikes produced only 7 to 15 grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiller grains weighed 60 to 75% as much as main stem grains.

Outcome
individual grains weighinge0
Value
60 to 75%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual grains weighing 60 to 75% of the weight of MS grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior cropping and environment appeared more influential for spike development and grain set than nitrogen.

Treatment
application of fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
spike development and grain‐sete0
Direction
more thane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Previous cropping practices and environmental conditions seemed to affect spike development and grain‐set more than application of fertilizer N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

299 papers: 252 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 252 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

295 papers more in this group

See all 299 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.