Abstract
CSM‐CERES‐Maize has been extensively used worldwide to simulate corn growth and grain production, but has not been evaluated for use in North Carolina. The objectives of this study were to calibrate CSM‐CERES‐Maize soil parameters and genetic coefficients using official variety trial data, evaluate model performance in North Carolina, and determine the suitability of the fitting technique using variety trial data for model calibration. The study used yield data for 53 maize genotypes collected from multiple locations over a 10‐yr period. A stepwise calibration procedure was utilized: (i) two genetic coefficients which determine anthesis and physiological maturity dates were adjusted based on growing degree day requirements for each hybrid; and (ii) plant available soil water and rooting profile were adjusted iteratively with two other genetic coefficients affecting yield. Cross validation was used to evaluate the suitability of this approach for estimating soil and genetic coefficients. The root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) were similar to fitting errors. Results indicate that CSM‐CERES‐Maize can be used in North Carolina to simulate corn growth under nonlimiting N conditions and variety trial data can be used for estimating genetic coefficients. Hybrid average simulated yields matched measured yields well across a wide range of environments, and simulated hybrid yield rankings were in close agreement with rankings based on measured yields. Data from several site‐years could not be used in fitting genetic coefficients due to large root mean squared errors. In some cases, this could be attributed to a weather event, such as a late‐season hurricane.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Cross-validation prediction errors were similar to fitting errors.
Verbatim
e0“The root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) were similar to fitting errors”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulated hybrid average yields matched measured yields well.
Verbatim
e0“Hybrid average simulated yields matched measured yields well across a wide range of environments”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulated hybrid yield rankings agreed closely with measured rankings.
Verbatim
e0“simulated hybrid yield rankings were in close agreement with rankings based on measured yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Several site-years could not be used for coefficient fitting due to high errors.
Verbatim
e0“Data from several site‐years could not be used in fitting genetic coefficients due to large root mean squared errors”