Paper · 1975 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Interactions of Microtubule Disorganizers, Plant Hormones, and Red Light in Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth

Verna R. Lawson; Robert L. Weintraub

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Growth response of coleoptile segments excised from 3-day-old seedlings of wheat (Triticum vulgare cv. Baart) to gibberellic acid, indoleacetic acid, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, to red light, and to several microtubule disorganizers depends on the initial position of the excised segment in the intact coleoptile. Red light, 660 nm, stimulates the growth of the apical cells, but inhibits markedly the growth of the cells in the basal region of the coleoptile. The effects of red light are independent of sucrose, gibberellic acid, indoleacetic acid, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, even though these substances themselves markedly affect the growth of the coleoptile segments. Concentractions of the microtubule disorganizers, vinblastine sulfate, cupric chloride, urea, and colchicine, which do not alter significantly the growth of the dark control apical segments, substantially repress the promotive effects of red light or auxin on the increase in length of the apical cells of the coleoptile. This suggests that stimulation by red light and by auxin involves microtubule production. Microtubule disorganizers repress the growth of elongating cells of the coleoptile, yet on the other hand, auxin and irradiation do not alter significantly the response of basal cells to the microtubule disorganizing agents. We hypothesized that light and growth regulators induce polymerization of nonaggregated microtubule subunits, resulting in faster growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Response of wheat coleoptile segments to hormones, red light and microtubule disorganizers depends on original segment position.

Material
Triticum vulgare cv. Baarte0
Organ / stage
coleoptile segmentse0
Outcome
Growth responsee0
Qualifier
initial position of the excised segmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth response of coleoptile segments excised from 3-day-old seedlings of wheat (Triticum vulgare cv. Baart) to gibberellic acid, indoleacetic acid, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, to red light, and to several microtubule disorganizers depends on the initial position of the excised segment in the intact coleoptile.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light stimulates growth of apical wheat coleoptile cells.

Organ / stage
apical cellse0
Treatment
Red light, 660 nme0
Outcome
growth of the apical cellse0
Direction
stimulatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red light, 660 nm, stimulates the growth of the apical cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light markedly inhibits growth of basal wheat coleoptile cells.

Organ / stage
basal region of the coleoptilee0
Treatment
Red light, 660 nme0
Outcome
growth of the cells in the basal region of the coleoptilee0
Direction
inhibitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red light, 660 nm, stimulates the growth of the apical cells, but inhibits markedly the growth of the cells in the basal region of the coleoptile.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light effects on wheat coleoptile growth are independent of sucrose and three hormones.

Outcome
effects of red lighte0
Qualifier
independent of sucrose, gibberellic acid, indoleacetic acid, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of red light are independent of sucrose, gibberellic acid, indoleacetic acid, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose and the three hormones markedly affect wheat coleoptile segment growth.

Outcome
growth of the coleoptile segmentse0
Qualifier
these substancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these substances themselves markedly affect the growth of the coleoptile segments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microtubule disorganizers substantially repress red-light-promoted elongation of apical wheat coleoptile cells at concentrations without significant dark-control growth effects.

Treatment
microtubule disorganizers, vinblastine sulfate, cupric chloride, urea, and colchicinee0
Outcome
increase in length of the apical cells of the coleoptilee0
Direction
represse0
Comparator
dark control apical segmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentractions of the microtubule disorganizers, vinblastine sulfate, cupric chloride, urea, and colchicine, which do not alter significantly the growth of the dark control apical segments, substantially repress the promotive effects of red light or auxin on the increase in length of the apical cells of the coleoptile.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microtubule disorganizers substantially repress auxin-promoted elongation of apical wheat coleoptile cells.

Treatment
microtubule disorganizers, vinblastine sulfate, cupric chloride, urea, and colchicinee0
Outcome
increase in length of the apical cells of the coleoptilee0
Direction
represse0
Comparator
dark control apical segmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentractions of the microtubule disorganizers, vinblastine sulfate, cupric chloride, urea, and colchicine, which do not alter significantly the growth of the dark control apical segments, substantially repress the promotive effects of red light or auxin on the increase in length of the apical cells of the coleoptile.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microtubule disorganizers repress growth of elongating wheat coleoptile cells.

Treatment
Microtubule disorganizerse0
Outcome
growth of elongating cells of the coleoptilee0
Direction
represse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microtubule disorganizers repress the growth of elongating cells of the coleoptile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin and irradiation do not significantly alter the basal cell response to microtubule disorganizers.

Treatment
auxin and irradiatione0
Outcome
response of basal cells to the microtubule disorganizing agentse0
Direction
do not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“auxin and irradiation do not alter significantly the response of basal cells to the microtubule disorganizing agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that red light and auxin stimulation involves microtubule production.

Outcome
stimulation by red light and by auxine0
Qualifier
microtubule productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This suggests that stimulation by red light and by auxin involves microtubule production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors hypothesize light and growth regulators induce polymerization of microtubule subunits, resulting in faster growth.

Outcome
faster growthe0
Qualifier
polymerization of nonaggregated microtubule subunitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We hypothesized that light and growth regulators induce polymerization of nonaggregated microtubule subunits, resulting in faster growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Coleoptile Segment Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 46 positive, 39 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.