Paper · 2011 · European Journal of Soil Science

Ammonia toxicity in aerobic rice: use of soil properties to predict ammonia volatilization following urea application and the adverse effects on germination

V. R. Haden; J. Xiang; S. Peng; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that aerobic rice can suffer injury from ammonia toxicity when urea is applied at seeding. Urea application rate and soil properties influence the accumulation of ammonia in the vicinity of recently sown seeds and hence influence the risk of ammonia toxicity. The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate the effects of urea rate on ammonia volatilization and subsequent seed germination for a range of soils, (ii) establish a critical level for ammonia toxicity in germinating rice seeds and (iii) assess how variation in soil properties influences ammonia accumulation. Volatilized ammonia and seed germination were measured in two micro‐diffusion incubations using 15 soils to which urea was applied at five rates (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 g N kg −1 soil). Progressively larger urea rates increased volatilization, decreased germination and indicated a critical level for ammonia toxicity of approximately 7 mg N kg −1 . Stepwise regression of the first three principal components indicated that the initial pH and soil texture components influenced ammonia volatilization when no N was added. At the intermediate N rate all three components (initial pH, soil texture and pH buffering) affected ammonia volatilization. At the largest N rate, ammonia volatilization was driven by soil texture and pH buffering while the role of initial pH was insignificant. For soils with an initial pH > 6.0 the risk of excessive volatilization increased dramatically when clay content was <150 mg kg −1 , cation exchange capacity (CEC) was <10 cmol c kg −1 and the buffer capacity (BC) was <2.5 cmol c kg −1 pH −1 . These findings suggest that initial pH, CEC, soil texture and BC should all be used to assess the site‐specific risks of urea‐induced ammonia toxicity in aerobic rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing urea rates increased ammonia volatilization.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
larger urea ratese0
Outcome
volatilizatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Progressively larger urea rates increased volatilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing urea rates decreased rice germination.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
larger urea ratese0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Progressively larger urea rates increased volatilization, decreased germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–870 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical ammonia toxicity level for germinating rice seeds was approximately 7 mg N kg −1.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Outcome
critical level for ammonia toxicitye0
Value
approximately 7 mg N kg −1e0

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“indicated a critical level for ammonia toxicity of approximately 7 mg N kg −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–952 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial pH and soil texture influenced ammonia volatilization without added N.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
no Ne0
Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione0
Qualifier
when no N was addede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“initial pH and soil texture components influenced ammonia volatilization when no N was added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1126 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial pH, soil texture and pH buffering affected ammonia volatilization at the intermediate N rate.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
intermediate N ratee0
Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the intermediate N rate all three components (initial pH, soil texture and pH buffering) affected ammonia volatilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1251 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil texture and pH buffering drove ammonia volatilization at the largest N rate.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
largest N ratee0
Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the largest N rate, ammonia volatilization was driven by soil texture and pH buffering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1342 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial pH had an insignificant role in volatilization at the largest N rate.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
largest N ratee0
Outcome
ammonia volatilizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the largest N rate, ammonia volatilization was driven by soil texture and pH buffering while the role of initial pH was insignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1389 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For soils above pH 6.0, low clay content, cation exchange capacity and buffer capacity greatly increased excessive volatilization risk.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Outcome
risk of excessive volatilizatione0
Direction
increased dramaticallye0
Qualifier
clay content was <150 mg kg −1 , cation exchange capacity (CEC) was <10 cmol c kg −1 and the buffer capacity (BC) was <2.5 cmol c kg −1 pH −1e0
Setting
soils with an initial pH > 6.0e0

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“For soils with an initial pH > 6.0 the risk of excessive volatilization increased dramatically when clay content was <150 mg kg −1 , cation exchange capacity (CEC) was <10 cmol c kg −1 and the buffer capacity (BC) was <2.5 cmol c kg −1 pH −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1632 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Initial pH, CEC, soil texture and BC should be used to assess site-specific urea toxicity risk in aerobic rice.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Outcome
used to assess the site‐specific risks of urea‐induced ammonia toxicitye0

Verbatim

t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“initial pH, CEC, soil texture and BC should all be used to assess the site‐specific risks of urea‐induced ammonia toxicity in aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1801 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.