Paper · 2000 · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Effect of pruning time and hydrogen cyanamide on budburst and subsequent phenology of Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon in central Victoria

STEPHEN R. MARTIN; GREGORY M. DUNN

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
44
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed description of effects from two pruning times and an application of hydrogen cyanamide on budburst and subsequent phenology in a population of spur-pruned, 13-year-old Vitis vinifera L. Cabernet Sauvignon vines grown in central Victoria in 1998/99. Later pruning (17 August), compared with earlier pruning (7 July), delayed the onset of budburst by an average of 4.3 days and 60% budburst by an average of 5.3 days. This difference persisted at anthesis (5.0 days), veraison (4.1 days) and at harvest (0.91°Brix). Application of hydrogen cyanamide on 26 August did not advance the timing of budburst but increased the number of shoots that burst. This was due predominantly to more ‘extra’ shoots bursting on old wood and at the base of spurs. In the earlier stages of budburst, ‘primary’ buds on clear nodes of 1 year-old wood (spurs) burst in preference to buds at the base of spurs or on old wood. However, by the end of the 5-week budburst period, the number of ‘extra’ shoots per vine was similar to the number of primary shoots on clear nodes. Primary shoots with more bunches tended to burst earlier. Conceivably, the number of inflorescences (potential reproductive sites) and the number of flowers (potential number of seeds) on a shoot that arises from a dormant latent bud indicate a ‘reproductive potential’ that exerts some control over dormancy release. The frequency of budburst was sensitive to fluctuations in air temperature, but limited by the number of buds available to burst. Temperature-based models designed to predict phenological events might be improved by including parameters that take pruning time and reproductive potential into account.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later pruning delayed onset of budburst by 4.3 days.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignont0
Treatment
Later pruning (17 August)e0
Outcome
onset of budburste0
Direction
delayede0
Value
4.3 dayse0
Comparator
earlier pruning (7 July)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Later pruning (17 August), compared with earlier pruning (7 July), delayed the onset of budburst by an average of 4.3 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later pruning delayed 60% budburst by 5.3 days.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
Later pruningt1
Outcome
60% budburste0
Direction
delayedt1
Value
5.3 dayse0
Comparator
earlier pruningt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“60% budburst by an average of 5.3 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
t1

“Later pruning (17 August), compared with earlier pruning (7 July), delayed the onset of budburst by an average of 4.3 days and 60% budburst by an average of 5.3 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–446 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pruning difference persisted at anthesis by 5.0 days.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
anthesise0
Direction
persistede0
Value
5.0 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This difference persisted at anthesis (5.0 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pruning difference persisted at veraison by 4.1 days.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
veraisone0
Value
4.1 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“veraison (4.1 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pruning difference persisted at harvest at 0.91°Brix.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
harveste0
Value
0.91°Brixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at harvest (0.91°Brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen cyanamide did not advance budburst timing.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
Application of hydrogen cyanamide on 26 Auguste0
Outcome
timing of budburste0
Direction
did not advancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of hydrogen cyanamide on 26 August did not advance the timing of budburst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen cyanamide increased the number of shoots that burst.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
Application of hydrogen cyanamide on 26 Auguste0
Outcome
number of shoots that burste0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of hydrogen cyanamide on 26 August did not advance the timing of budburst but increased the number of shoots that burst.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increased burst was predominantly from extra shoots on old wood and spur bases.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
old wood and at the base of spurse0
Outcome
more ‘extra’ shoots burstinge0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was due predominantly to more ‘extra’ shoots bursting on old wood and at the base of spurs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary buds on clear nodes burst preferentially early in budburst.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
‘primary’ buds on clear nodes of 1 year-old wood (spurs)e0
Outcome
burst in preferencee0
Direction
in preferencee0
Comparator
buds at the base of spurs or on old woode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the earlier stages of budburst, ‘primary’ buds on clear nodes of 1 year-old wood (spurs) burst in preference to buds at the base of spurs or on old wood.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By the end of five weeks, extra shoot number resembled primary shoot number.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
number of ‘extra’ shoots per vinee0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
5-week budburst periode0
Comparator
number of primary shoots on clear nodese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by the end of the 5-week budburst period, the number of ‘extra’ shoots per vine was similar to the number of primary shoots on clear nodes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary shoots with more bunches tended to burst earlier.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
Primary shootse0
Outcome
burste0
Direction
earliere0
Qualifier
more bunchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primary shoots with more bunches tended to burst earlier.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Budburst frequency was sensitive to air temperature fluctuations.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
fluctuations in air temperaturee0
Outcome
frequency of budburste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The frequency of budburst was sensitive to fluctuations in air temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bud availability limited budburst frequency.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
budse0
Outcome
number of buds available to burste0
Direction
limitede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“limited by the number of buds available to burst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–130 · show in text ↑

cyanamide · phenology · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cyanamide · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · phenology · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 9 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.