Paper · 1970 · Agronomy Journal

Influence of Row Spacing, Irrigation, and Weeds on Dryland Flax Yield, Quality, and Water Use1

J. Alessi; J. F. Power

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted during 1966 and 1967 at Mandan, N. D. to evaluate the effects of row spacing (7.5, 15, and 30 cm), irrigation water at fruiting, and weed competition (primarily from Setaria virilis ) on water use by flax ( Linum usitatissinum L.). An irrigation of 50 mm at the fruiting stage increased flaxseed yields only when weeds were controlled, particularly in the dry year of 1967. Flaxseed yields increased at row spacing narrowed from 30 to 7.5 cm only on unweeded plots. Weed growth reduced flaxseed yields for the 2‐year period from 26 to 53%, with the least reduction from 7.5‐cm row spacing. Midsummer rains or supplemental water at fruiting was less effective in increasing flaxseed production when weeds were present, but some degree of weed control was achieved with narrower row spacing. Oil content of flaxseed was not affected by treatments, but iodine number was slightly higher for the wider spacing (30 cm) in 1966. Total water use was not affected by row spacing or weed treatment, but water use efficiency was increased by narrow row spacing and by weed control. Water use patterns indicated deeper root penetration during the drier year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruiting-stage irrigation increased flaxseed yield only when weeds were controlled.

Treatment
irrigation of 50 mm at the fruiting stagee0
Outcome
flaxseed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only when weeds were controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An irrigation of 50 mm at the fruiting stage increased flaxseed yields only when weeds were controlled, particularly in the dry year of 1967.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrowing rows increased yields only in unweeded plots.

Treatment
row spacing narrowed from 30 to 7.5 cme0
Outcome
Flaxseed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only on unweeded plotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flaxseed yields increased at row spacing narrowed from 30 to 7.5 cm only on unweeded plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed growth cut flaxseed yield by 26 to 53%, least at 7.5 cm rows.

Treatment
Weed growthe0
Outcome
flaxseed yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
26 to 53%e0
Qualifier
least reduction from 7.5‐cm row spacinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed growth reduced flaxseed yields for the 2‐year period from 26 to 53%, with the least reduction from 7.5‐cm row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water at fruiting was less effective for yield when weeds were present.

Treatment
supplemental water at fruitinge0
Outcome
flaxseed productione0
Direction
less effectivee0
Qualifier
when weeds were presente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplemental water at fruiting was less effective in increasing flaxseed production when weeds were present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrower rows gave some weed control.

Treatment
narrower row spacinge0
Outcome
weed controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some degree of weed control was achieved with narrower row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not affect flaxseed oil content.

Taxon
flaxseede0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Oil contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Oil content of flaxseed was not affected by treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing slightly increased iodine number in 1966.

Treatment
wider spacing (30 cm)e0
Outcome
iodine numbere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“iodine number was slightly higher for the wider spacing (30 cm) in 1966.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing did not affect total water use.

Treatment
row spacinge0
Outcome
Total water usee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total water use was not affected by row spacing or weed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed treatment did not affect total water use.

Treatment
weed treatmente0
Outcome
Total water usee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total water use was not affected by row spacing or weed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow spacing increased water use efficiency.

Treatment
narrow row spacinge0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency was increased by narrow row spacing and by weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control increased water use efficiency.

Treatment
weed controle0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency was increased by narrow row spacing and by weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use patterns suggested deeper roots in the drier year.

Outcome
deeper root penetratione0
Qualifier
during the drier yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water use patterns indicated deeper root penetration during the drier year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

density · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 30 positive, 15 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

density · weed · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.