Paper · 1999 · New Phytologist

Growth response of grassland species to ozone in relation to soil moisture condition and plant strategy

P. BUNGENER; S. NUSSBAUM; A. GRUB; et al.

18
claims
24
verbatim quotes
69
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plant species typical of semi‐natural grasslands were tested for their sensitivity to long‐term ozone effects on growth under two irrigation regimes, and the relationship between ozone sensitivity, relative growth rate, and plant strategy was analysed. Individuals of 24 grasses, herbs and legumes were grown in pots and exposed for two seasons to four levels of ozone in open‐top chambers: (a) CF, charcoal‐filtered air, (b) CFAA, charcoal‐filtered air plus ozone to match ambient levels, (c) CF+, charcoal‐filtered air plus ozone added to match 1.5 times ambient levels and (d) CF++, charcoal‐filtered air with ozone added to match twice ambient levels during selected episodes of 7–13 d. During the ozone episodes, one half of the plants received reduced irrigation (dry treatment) while the rest was kept well watered (wet treatment). The effect of ozone on the relative growth rate was determined during the initial growth period during the first season. Above‐ground plant dry weight was determined three times during each season, and stubble dry weight at the end of the experiment. In most species, the effect of ozone on relative growth rate was not significant, except in Centaurea jacea and Lychnis flos‐cuculi for which a significant stimulation of relative growth rate was found. There was a significant negative relationship between percentage relative growth rate and relative growth rate measured in the CF treatment, indicating that in species growing faster in clean air relative growth rate tended to be more sensitive to ozone than in slower‐growing species. After the first re‐growth period during the first season, a significant effect of ozone on above‐ground biomass was found in five species, i.e. a decrease in Chrysanthemum leucanthemum , Trifolium pratense and T. repens , and an increase in Silene dioïca . During the second season no significant ozone effect was detected, except for an increase in stubble mass in C. leucanthemum . In 10 species, the dry treatment caused a significant decrease in biomass, but in Plantago lanceolata during the first year, and in Knautia arvensis and T. repens during the second year, an ozone×irrigation interaction was observed. Exposure–response patterns in the wet treatment varied between species. In some species growth tended to be increased in charcoal‐filtered air plus ozone to ambient levels, in others either a continuous increase or decrease in biomass was observed with increasing ozone. Trifolium repens showed the lowest AOT40 (ozone accumulated above a threshold of 40 ppb) corresponding to a 10% change in biomass. The comparison between exposure–response pattern between the wet and dry treatments revealed reduced, increased, or unchanged ozone sensitivity. The shift was related to plant strategy and not to the specific sensitivity to the dry treatment. The specific response to both ozone and dry treatment tended to be related to Grime's triangular classification of plant strategies, i.e. the C‐S‐R model. In species with a large component of C (competitor strategy), and/or R (ruderal strategy), biomass was more sensitive to both stresses, compared with species with a high component of S (stress tolerators), and ozone×drought interactions were more pronounced. The results indicate that specific relative growth rate is an important determinant for the potential sensitivity of grassland species to long‐term effects of ozone, and that reduced irrigation causes no general protection from the effects of ozone on growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone significantly stimulated relative growth rate in Centaurea jacea.

Taxon
Centaurea jaceaCentaurea jaceae0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
stimulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Centaurea jacea
Centaurea jacea · Taxonchelo Vechek / talk · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most species, the effect of ozone on relative growth rate was not significant, except in Centaurea jacea and Lychnis flos‐cuculi for which a significant stimulation of relative growth rate was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone significantly stimulated relative growth rate in Lychnis flos‐cuculi.

Taxon
Lychnis flos‐cuculie0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
stimulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In most species, the effect of ozone on relative growth rate was not significant, except in Centaurea jacea and Lychnis flos‐cuculi for which a significant stimulation of relative growth rate was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1291 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Species with faster growth in clean air tended to have greater ozone sensitivity of relative growth rate.

Taxon
grassland speciest0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
negativee0
Comparator
CF treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant negative relationship between percentage relative growth rate and relative growth rate measured in the CF treatment, indicating that in species growing faster in clean air relative growth rate tended to be more sensitive to ozone than in slower‐growing species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“grassland species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone caused a significant decrease in aboveground biomass of Chrysanthemum leucanthemum after first regrowth.

Taxon
Chrysanthemum leucanthemumLeucanthemum vulgaree0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
above‐ground biomasse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
first re‐growth periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucanthemum vulgare
Leucanthemum vulgare · TaxonVictor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the first re‐growth period during the first season, a significant effect of ozone on above‐ground biomass was found in five species, i.e. a decrease in Chrysanthemum leucanthemum , Trifolium pratense and T. repens , and an increase in Silene dioïca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone caused a significant decrease in aboveground biomass of Trifolium pratense after first regrowth.

Taxon
Trifolium pratenseTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
above‐ground biomasse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
first re‐growth periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the first re‐growth period during the first season, a significant effect of ozone on above‐ground biomass was found in five species, i.e. a decrease in Chrysanthemum leucanthemum , Trifolium pratense and T. repens , and an increase in Silene dioïca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone caused a significant decrease in aboveground biomass of T. repens after first regrowth.

Taxon
T. repensTrifolium repense0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
above‐ground biomasse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
first re‐growth periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the first re‐growth period during the first season, a significant effect of ozone on above‐ground biomass was found in five species, i.e. a decrease in Chrysanthemum leucanthemum , Trifolium pratense and T. repens , and an increase in Silene dioïca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone caused a significant increase in aboveground biomass of Silene dioïca after first regrowth.

Taxon
Silene dioïcae0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
above‐ground biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
first re‐growth periode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After the first re‐growth period during the first season, a significant effect of ozone on above‐ground biomass was found in five species, i.e. a decrease in Chrysanthemum leucanthemum , Trifolium pratense and T. repens , and an increase in Silene dioïca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone increased stubble mass of C. leucanthemum in the second season.

Taxon
C. leucanthemumLeucanthemum vulgaree0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
stubble masse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucanthemum vulgare
Leucanthemum vulgare · TaxonVictor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the second season no significant ozone effect was detected, except for an increase in stubble mass in C. leucanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation significantly decreased biomass in ten species.

Taxon
grassland speciest0
Treatment
dry treatmente0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
10 speciese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In 10 species, the dry treatment caused a significant decrease in biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2036 · show in text ↑
t0

“grassland species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An ozone by irrigation interaction was observed in Plantago lanceolata in the first year.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae0
Treatment
ozone×irrigatione0
Outcome
ozone×irrigation interactione0
Qualifier
first yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Plantago lanceolata during the first year, and in Knautia arvensis and T. repens during the second year, an ozone×irrigation interaction was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2194 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An ozone by irrigation interaction was observed in Knautia arvensis in the second year.

Taxon
Knautia arvensisKnautia arvensise0
Treatment
ozone×irrigatione0
Outcome
ozone×irrigation interactione0
Qualifier
second yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Knautia arvensis
Knautia arvensis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Plantago lanceolata during the first year, and in Knautia arvensis and T. repens during the second year, an ozone×irrigation interaction was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2194 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An ozone by irrigation interaction was observed in T. repens in the second year.

Taxon
T. repensTrifolium repense0
Treatment
ozone×irrigatione0
Outcome
ozone×irrigation interactione0
Qualifier
second yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Plantago lanceolata during the first year, and in Knautia arvensis and T. repens during the second year, an ozone×irrigation interaction was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2194 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifolium repens had the lowest ozone exposure threshold corresponding to a 10% biomass change.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repense0
Outcome
AOT40e0
Direction
loweste0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trifolium repens showed the lowest AOT40 (ozone accumulated above a threshold of 40 ppb) corresponding to a 10% change in biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2467–2596 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone sensitivity shifts between wet and dry conditions were related to plant strategy.

Taxon
grassland speciest0
Treatment
dry treatmente0
Outcome
The shifte0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The shift was related to plant strategy and not to the specific sensitivity to the dry treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2743–2839 · show in text ↑
t0

“grassland species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species with larger competitor or ruderal strategy components had more biomass sensitivity to both stresses than stress tolerators.

Taxon
grassland speciest0
Treatment
both stressese0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
species with a high component of Se0

Verbatim

e0

“In species with a large component of C (competitor strategy), and/or R (ruderal strategy), biomass was more sensitive to both stresses, compared with species with a high component of S (stress tolerators), and ozone×drought interactions were more pronounced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2996–3253 · show in text ↑
t0

“grassland species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone by drought interactions were more pronounced in competitor or ruderal species than stress tolerators.

Taxon
grassland speciest0
Outcome
ozone×drought interactionse0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
species with a high component of Se0

Verbatim

e0

“In species with a large component of C (competitor strategy), and/or R (ruderal strategy), biomass was more sensitive to both stresses, compared with species with a high component of S (stress tolerators), and ozone×drought interactions were more pronounced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2996–3253 · show in text ↑
t0

“grassland species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–36 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific relative growth rate was identified as a determinant of long term ozone sensitivity.

Taxon
grassland speciese0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
potential sensitivitye0
Qualifier
specific relative growth ratee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“specific relative growth rate is an important determinant for the potential sensitivity of grassland species to long‐term effects of ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3281–3419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation offered no general protection from ozone effects on growth.

Taxon
grassland speciest0
Treatment
reduced irrigatione0
Outcome
effects of ozone on growthe0
Direction
no general protectione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“reduced irrigation causes no general protection from the effects of ozone on growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3430–3513 · show in text ↑
t0

“grassland species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–36 · show in text ↑

ozone · growth · Leucanthemum vulgareResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

ozone · growth · Trifolium pratense (red clover)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

ozone · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.