Paper · 1979 · Agronomy Journal

Yields and Protein Content of Wheat Grain as Affected by Cultivar, N, and Environmental Growth Factors1

G. L. Terman

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
74
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Grain protein is important in human and animal nutrition and in relation to various culinary uses of flour. Various wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars are reported to vary widely in grain yield and protein concentrations. To study yield‐protein relationships, three soft red winter (Atlas 66, Knox 62, and Blue Boy) and three hard red winter (Norin 16, Tascosa, and Omaha) wheat cultivars were grown in a pot experiment at Muscle Shoals, Alabama. Response to 0, 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1,200 mg of N/pot (3 kg of Mountview silt loam) together with adequate, uniform rates of other nutrients was determined. All cultivars increased similarly in grain and straw yields, crude protein concentrations, and crude protein / pot with amount of applied N. The ranking for grain yields was: Tascosa > Blue Boy = Knox 62 > Omaha > Norin 16 > Atlas. The ranking for crude protein concentrations was in the reverse order. These trends indicate pronounced genetic differences among cultivars. At each rate of applied N, protein concentrations were also inversely related to grain and straw yields. Early uptake of N at forage and boot stages of growth was usually highly correlated with uptake in grain + straw at maturity. Nitrogen and moisture supply, light, temperature, and other growth factors greatly affect yield‐protein relationships among cultivars. Differences among cultivars tended to be greatest under optimum growth conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied N similarly increased grain and straw yields across wheat cultivars.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Treatment
applied Ne0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All cultivars increased similarly in grain and straw yields, crude protein concentrations, and crude protein / pot with amount of applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied N similarly increased crude protein concentrations and crude protein per pot.

Treatment
applied Ne0
Outcome
crude protein concentrations, and crude protein / pote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All cultivars increased similarly in grain and straw yields, crude protein concentrations, and crude protein / pot with amount of applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield ranked Tascosa highest and Atlas lowest among the six cultivars.

Material
Tascosae0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
rankinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ranking for grain yields was: Tascosa > Blue Boy = Knox 62 > Omaha > Norin 16 > Atlas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein concentrations ranked in the reverse cultivar order to grain yield.

Outcome
crude protein concentrationse0
Direction
reverse ordere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ranking for crude protein concentrations was in the reverse order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At each applied N rate, wheat protein concentration was inversely related to grain and straw yields.

Outcome
protein concentrationse0
Direction
inversely relatede0
Comparator
grain and straw yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At each rate of applied N, protein concentrations were also inversely related to grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early N uptake at forage and boot stages was usually highly correlated with uptake at maturity.

Organ / stage
forage and boot stages of growthe0
Outcome
Early uptake of Ne0
Comparator
uptake in grain + straw at maturitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early uptake of N at forage and boot stages of growth was usually highly correlated with uptake in grain + straw at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar differences tended to be greatest under optimum growth conditions.

Outcome
Differences among cultivarse0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
optimum growth conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences among cultivars tended to be greatest under optimum growth conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.