Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Synergistic effects of the inoculation with nitrogen‐fixing and phosphate‐solubilizing rhizobacteria on the performance of field‐grown chickpea

Parvaze A. Wani; Mohammad Saghir Khan; Almas Zaidi

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
245
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The synergistic effects of nitrogen‐fixing and phosphate‐solubilizing rhizobacteria on plant growth, yield, grain protein, and nutrient uptake of chickpea plants were determined in a sandy clay‐loam soil. Legume grain yield and concentration and uptake of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) were significantly increased as a result of co‐inoculation with Mesorhizobium and P‐solubilizing Pseudomonas and Bacillus spp. The inoculation with M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococuum A10 + Bacillus PSB9 tripled the seed yield and resulted in highest grain protein (295 mg g –1 ) at 145 d after sowing (DAS). An 8% increase in P concentration above the uninoculated control was observed in case of a single inoculation with Pseudomonas PSB 5, while the P uptake was highest (2.14‐fold above the uninoculated control) with a combined inoculation with [ M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococcum A10 + Bacillus PSB 9] at 145 DAS. The highest N concentration and N uptake at 145 DAS (81% and 16% above the uninoculated control, respectively) were observed with the triple inoculation of [ M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococcum A10 + Pseudomonas PSB 5). These findings show that multiple inoculations with rhizospheric microorganisms can promote plant growth and grain yield and increase concentrations and uptake of N and P by field‐grown chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation with Mesorhizobium significantly increased chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mesorhizobiume2
Interactor
MesorhizobiumMesorhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Legume grain yield and concentration and uptake of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“with Mesorhizobium and”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation with Mesorhizobium significantly increased chickpea concentration and uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mesorhizobiume2
Interactor
MesorhizobiumMesorhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
concentration and uptake of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P)e1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Legume grain yield and concentration and uptake of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“with Mesorhizobium and”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. ciceri RC4, A. chroococuum A10 and Bacillus PSB9 tripled chickpea seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococuum A10 + Bacillus PSB9e3
Interactor
M. ciceri RC4Mesorhizobium cicerie3symbiont
Second interactor
A. chroococuum A10e3symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde3
Direction
triplede3
Qualifier
Bacillus PSB9e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–143 · show in text ↑
e3

“The inoculation with M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococuum A10 + Bacillus PSB9 tripled the seed yield and resulted in highest grain protein (295 mg g –1 ) at 145 d after sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. ciceri RC4, A. chroococuum A10 and Bacillus PSB9 gave the highest chickpea grain protein at 145 days after sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococuum A10 + Bacillus PSB9e3
Outcome
grain proteine3
Direction
higheste3
Value
295 mg g –1e3
Qualifier
at 145 d after sowinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–143 · show in text ↑
e3

“The inoculation with M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococuum A10 + Bacillus PSB9 tripled the seed yield and resulted in highest grain protein (295 mg g –1 ) at 145 d after sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single inoculation with Pseudomonas PSB 5 increased chickpea phosphorus concentration by 8% above the uninoculated control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
single inoculation with Pseudomonas PSB 5e4
Interactor
Pseudomonas PSB 5e4symbiont
Outcome
P concentratione4
Direction
increasee4
Value
8%e4
Comparator
uninoculated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–143 · show in text ↑
e4

“An 8% increase in P concentration above the uninoculated control was observed in case of a single inoculation with Pseudomonas PSB 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation with M. ciceri RC4 and A. chroococcum A10 gave the highest chickpea P uptake at 145 DAS, 2.14-fold above the uninoculated control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined inoculation with [ M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococcum A10 + Bacillus PSB 9]e5
Interactor
M. ciceri RC4Mesorhizobium cicerie5symbiont
Second interactor
A. chroococcum A10e5symbiont
Outcome
P uptakee6
Direction
higheste6
Value
2.14e6
Qualifier
at 145 DASe5
Comparator
uninoculated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–143 · show in text ↑
e4

“An 8% increase in P concentration above the uninoculated control was observed in case of a single inoculation with Pseudomonas PSB 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–733 · show in text ↑
e5

“with a combined inoculation with [ M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococcum A10 + Bacillus PSB 9] at 145 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–907 · show in text ↑
e6

“while the P uptake was highest (2.14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple inoculation with M. ciceri RC4, A. chroococcum A10 and Pseudomonas PSB 5 gave the highest chickpea N concentration at 145 DAS, 81% above the uninoculated control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
triple inoculation of [ M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococcum A10 + Pseudomonas PSB 5)e7
Interactor
M. ciceri RC4Mesorhizobium cicerie7symbiont
Second interactor
A. chroococcum A10e7symbiont
Outcome
N concentratione7
Direction
higheste7
Value
81%e7
Qualifier
at 145 DASe7
Comparator
uninoculated controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–143 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest N concentration and N uptake at 145 DAS (81% and 16% above the uninoculated control, respectively) were observed with the triple inoculation of [ M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococcum A10 + Pseudomonas PSB 5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple inoculation with M. ciceri RC4, A. chroococcum A10 and Pseudomonas PSB 5 gave the highest chickpea N uptake at 145 DAS, 16% above the uninoculated control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
triple inoculation of [ M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococcum A10 + Pseudomonas PSB 5)e7
Interactor
M. ciceri RC4Mesorhizobium cicerie7symbiont
Second interactor
A. chroococcum A10e7symbiont
Outcome
N uptakee7
Direction
higheste7
Value
16%e7
Qualifier
at 145 DASe7
Comparator
uninoculated controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–143 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest N concentration and N uptake at 145 DAS (81% and 16% above the uninoculated control, respectively) were observed with the triple inoculation of [ M. ciceri RC4 + A. chroococcum A10 + Pseudomonas PSB 5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1122 · show in text ↑

Mesorhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Mesorhizobium ciceri · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Mesorhizobium ciceri · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Mesorhizobium ciceri · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Mesorhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.