Paper · 2011 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Nitrogen fertilization does not affect micronutrient uptake in grain maize (Zea maysL.)

Tomas Losak; Jaroslav Hlusek; Jiri Martinec; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Due to continuous single nitrogen fertilization, we hypothesized a built-up deficiency of micronutrients in crops that would limit plant growth and crop quality. In 2-year field experiments using urea-N fertilized grain maize (Zea mays L.), hybrid KWS 2376 at 0, 120 and 240 kg N ha−1 crop uptake of Zn, Mn, Cu and Fe was studied at DC 32, DC 61 and in the grain harvested. Micronutrient contents at DC 32 stage – 1st node (aboveground phytomass) and DC 61 – flowering (ear leaf) were all at levels indicative of adequate micronutrient supply to the crop. At both sampling occasions the Fe:Zn and Fe:Mn ratios were adequate implying that Fe did not inhibit the uptake of Zn and Mn. The application of nitrogen increased the Fe content at the 1st sampling in both years; in the second year the same was also the case for the Zn content. Nitrogen nutrition increased the contents of Mn and Fe at the 2nd sampling only in year 2; in the other treatments no changes were observed in the micronutrient contents. Micronutrient correlations in the grain were discovered between Zn and Mn contents and between Fe and Mn contents. In the second year the highest N-rate significantly increased the Fe and Zn content of the grain compared with the lower rates of nitrogen fertilization. Grain yields were not affected by the rate of nitrogen and ranged between 13.65 and 14.34 t ha−1 (1st year) and between 13.68 and 14.18 t ha−1 (2nd year). Nitrogen fertilization did not reduce the content of micronutrients in the plant or grain of maize. It is evident that the continuous single use of N fertilization so far has not resulted in a micronutrient deficiency of the plants limiting the nutrient density of the grain or reducing its quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize micronutrient contents at the first node and flowering stages indicated adequate supply.

Taxon
grain maizee1
Organ / stage
DC 32 stage – 1st node (aboveground phytomass) and DC 61 – flowering (ear leaf)e0
Outcome
Micronutrient contentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient contents at DC 32 stage – 1st node (aboveground phytomass) and DC 61 – flowering (ear leaf) were all at levels indicative of adequate micronutrient supply to the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–564 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate Fe:Zn and Fe:Mn ratios implied no inhibition of Zn and Mn uptake by Fe.

Taxon
grain maizee1
Outcome
Fe:Zn and Fe:Mn ratios were adequatee0

Verbatim

e0

“At both sampling occasions the Fe:Zn and Fe:Mn ratios were adequate implying that Fe did not inhibit the uptake of Zn and Mn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased Fe content at first sampling in both years.

Taxon
grain maizee1
Treatment
application of nitrogene0
Outcome
Fe contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
1st sampling in both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of nitrogen increased the Fe content at the 1st sampling in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased Zn content at first sampling in the second year.

Taxon
grain maizee2
Treatment
application of nitrogene1
Outcome
Zn contente0
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in the second yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in the second year the same was also the case for the Zn content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of nitrogen increased the Fe content at the 1st sampling in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–777 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen nutrition increased Mn and Fe contents at second sampling only in year two.

Taxon
grain maizee1
Treatment
Nitrogen nutritione0
Outcome
contents of Mn and Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
2nd sampling only in year 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen nutrition increased the contents of Mn and Fe at the 2nd sampling only in year 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Zn and Mn contents were correlated.

Taxon
grain maizee1
Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
Zn and Mn contentse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient correlations in the grain were discovered between Zn and Mn contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Fe and Mn contents were correlated.

Taxon
grain maizee2
Organ / stage
graine1
Outcome
Fe and Mn contentse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“between Fe and Mn contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Micronutrient correlations in the grain were discovered between Zn and Mn contents and between Fe and Mn contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1130 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest N rate significantly increased grain Fe and Zn content relative to lower rates in year two.

Taxon
grain maizee1
Treatment
highest N-ratee0
Outcome
Fe and Zn content of the graine0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
In the second yeare0
Comparator
lower rates of nitrogen fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“In the second year the highest N-rate significantly increased the Fe and Zn content of the grain compared with the lower rates of nitrogen fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not vary with nitrogen rate, ranging from 13.65 to 14.34 t ha−1 in year one.

Taxon
grain maizee1
Treatment
rate of nitrogene0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
not affectede0
Value
13.65 and 14.34 t ha−1e0
Qualifier
1st yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields were not affected by the rate of nitrogen and ranged between 13.65 and 14.34 t ha−1 (1st year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1392 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not vary with nitrogen rate, ranging from 13.68 to 14.18 t ha−1 in year two.

Taxon
grain maizee1
Treatment
rate of nitrogene0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
not affectede0
Value
13.68 and 14.18 t ha−1e0
Qualifier
2nd yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields were not affected by the rate of nitrogen and ranged between 13.65 and 14.34 t ha−1 (1st year) and between 13.68 and 14.18 t ha−1 (2nd year).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1439 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.