Paper · 1965 · Agronomy Journal

Comparative Efficiency of Liquid and Peat‐Base Inoculants on Field‐Grown Soybeans (Glycine max)1

J. C. Burton; R. L. Curley

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Synopsis Both types of inoculant were effective when the seed were planted 1 day after inoculating, but when seed were held for 7, 14, or 21 days before planting, the peat‐base inoculant proved superior in bringing about effective nodulation and higher yields. The efficiency of the liquid inoculum for preinoculating soybeans was not improved appreciably by increasing the number of rhizobia 2½ times. Possible explanations of the superiority of the peat base inoculum are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both inoculants were effective when soybean seeds were planted one day after inoculation.

Taxon
Soybeans (Glycine max)Glycine maxt0
Treatment
Both types of inoculante0
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
1 day after inoculatinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both types of inoculant were effective when the seed were planted 1 day after inoculating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–98 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 7, 14, or 21 days of seed holding, peat-base inoculant gave superior soybean nodulation.

Taxon
Soybeans (Glycine max)Glycine maxt0
Treatment
peat‐base inoculante0
Outcome
effective nodulatione0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
7, 14, or 21 days before plantinge0
Comparator
liquid inoculume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when seed were held for 7, 14, or 21 days before planting, the peat‐base inoculant proved superior in bringing about effective nodulation and higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficiency of the liquid inoculum for preinoculating soybeans was not improved appreciably by increasing the number of rhizobia 2½ times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 7, 14, or 21 days of seed holding, peat-base inoculant gave higher soybean yields.

Taxon
Soybeans (Glycine max)Glycine maxt0
Treatment
peat‐base inoculante0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
7, 14, or 21 days before plantinge0
Comparator
liquid inoculume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when seed were held for 7, 14, or 21 days before planting, the peat‐base inoculant proved superior in bringing about effective nodulation and higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficiency of the liquid inoculum for preinoculating soybeans was not improved appreciably by increasing the number of rhizobia 2½ times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing rhizobia in liquid inoculum by 2½ times did not appreciably improve preinoculation efficiency.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
increasing the number of rhizobia 2½ timese0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
efficiency of the liquid inoculum for preinoculating soybeanse0
Direction
not improved appreciablye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficiency of the liquid inoculum for preinoculating soybeans was not improved appreciably by increasing the number of rhizobia 2½ times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–401 · show in text ↑

growing medium · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

growing medium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

310 papers: 265 positive, 45 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

306 papers more in this group

See all 310 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.