Paper · 2012 · Experimental Agriculture

PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING BACTERIAL ENDOPHYTES FROM SUGARCANE AND THEIR POTENTIAL IN PROMOTING GROWTH OF THE HOST UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS

HEMLATA CHAUHAN; D. J. BAGYARAJ; ANITA SHARMA

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Ten endophytic bacteria were isolated from different sugarcane varieties growing in the Crop Research Centre, Pantnagar on nitrogen-free medium. Plant growth-promoting potential of the isolates was reported in terms of indole acetic acid (IAA) production, phosphorus solubilization, siderophore production and antagonistic action against the pathogen Colletotrichum falcatum , which causes red rot disease in sugarcane in vitro . All the isolates were able to produce IAA (4.8–9 μg ml −1 ); three isolates (H3, H5 and H14) solubilized insoluble phosphorus on Pikovaskaya's agar; two isolates (H10 and H14) showed siderophore production on Chrome-azurol S (CAS) agar and antagonism against C. falcatum was exhibited by two isolates (H14 and H15) in a dual plate assay. 16 S rRNA sequencing identified isolates H3 and H12 as Pseudomonas spp., and H8, H14 and H15 as Bacillus spp. A field experiment on sugarcane was conducted with five plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes Pseudomonas spp. (H3 and H12) and Bacillus spp. (H8, H14 and H15) along with standard strains of Gluconacetobacter and Azospirillum spp. Plant height, chlorophyll content, total nitrogen and cane length were significantly higher in almost all inoculated plants compared with the uninoculated control. An increase of 40% in cane yield over the control was obtained after inoculation with isolate H15 ( Bacillus spp.). This was statistically on par with the standard endophyte Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus , which resulted in 42% increased cane yield. Identification of new diazotrophs and their promising results towards improving plant growth in the field suggest their use as inoculants in future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All isolates produced IAA at 4.8–9 μg ml −1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
produce IAAe0
Value
4.8–9 μg ml −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“All the isolates were able to produce IAA (4.8–9 μg ml −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H3, H5 and H14 solubilized insoluble phosphorus.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
H3, H5 and H14e0
Outcome
solubilized insoluble phosphoruse0

Verbatim

e0

“three isolates (H3, H5 and H14) solubilized insoluble phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H10 and H14 produced siderophores.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
H10 and H14e0
Outcome
siderophore productione0

Verbatim

e0

“two isolates (H10 and H14) showed siderophore production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H14 and H15 antagonized C. falcatum in a dual plate assay.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
H14 and H15e0
Interactor
C. falcatumColletotrichum falcatume0pathogen
Outcome
antagonism against C. falcatume0

Verbatim

e0

“antagonism against C. falcatum was exhibited by two isolates (H14 and H15) in a dual plate assay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H3 and H12 were identified as Pseudomonas spp.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
identified isolates H3 and H12 as Pseudomonas spp.e0

Verbatim

e0

“16 S rRNA sequencing identified isolates H3 and H12 as Pseudomonas spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H8, H14 and H15 were identified as Bacillus spp.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
H8, H14 and H15 as Bacillus spp.e0

Verbatim

e0

“H8, H14 and H15 as Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants had significantly greater plant height, chlorophyll content and total nitrogen.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
Plant height, chlorophyll content, total nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, chlorophyll content, total nitrogen and cane length were significantly higher in almost all inoculated plants compared with the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants had significantly greater cane length.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
cane lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, chlorophyll content, total nitrogen and cane length were significantly higher in almost all inoculated plants compared with the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H15 inoculation increased cane yield by 40% over control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
inoculation with isolate H15e0
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of 40% in cane yield over the control was obtained after inoculation with isolate H15 ( Bacillus spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus increased cane yield by 42%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicuse0
Interactor
Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicusGluconacetobacter diazotrophicuse0symbiont
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus , which resulted in 42% increased cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest using the newly identified diazotrophs as inoculants.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
use as inoculants in futuree0

Verbatim

e0

“suggest their use as inoculants in future”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1687 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑

Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.