Paper · 2007 · Acta Agronomica Hungarica

Productivity and nitrogen use efficiency parameters in cotton cultivars with varying N levels and soil types under rainfed conditions

M. Venugopalan; K. Hebbar; P. Tiwary; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted under rainfed conditions, on a shallow soil (Inceptisol) underlain with weathered basalt and on a deep soil (Vertisol) to evaluate three cotton cultivars [AKH 4 ( Gossypium arboreum ), LRK 516 ( G. hirsutum ) and NHH 44 (intra- hirsutum hybrid)] under four levels of N (0, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha −1 ) and to analyse the variations in productivity using the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) parameter. The yield of AKH4 and NHH 44 was 101 and 89% higher than that of LRK 516. The yield and the response to N were higher on the Inceptisol. The enhanced yield and NUE of AKH 4 and NHH 44 were attributed to the improved efficiency of N uptake utilization. NUE declined from 21.6 at 40 kg ha −1 to 7.7 at 120 kg N ha −1 . The N uptake efficiency and N utilization efficiency were independent of each other, but complemented each other in improving NUE. The implications of variations in NUE, N uptake efficiency and N utilization efficiency and their components, N biomass production efficiency and HI, in cotton breeding and agronomy are also discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AKH4 cotton yield was 101% higher than LRK 516.

Material
AKH4e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
101e0
Comparator
LRK 516e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of AKH4 and NHH 44 was 101 and 89% higher than that of LRK 516”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NHH 44 cotton yield was 89% higher than LRK 516.

Material
NHH 44e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
89%e0
Comparator
LRK 516e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of AKH4 and NHH 44 was 101 and 89% higher than that of LRK 516”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield was higher on Inceptisol.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Setting
Inceptisole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and the response to N were higher on the Inceptisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton response to nitrogen was higher on Inceptisol.

Outcome
response to Ne0
Direction
highere0
Setting
Inceptisole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and the response to N were higher on the Inceptisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced yield and NUE in AKH 4 and NHH 44 were attributed to improved N uptake utilization efficiency.

Material
AKH 4e0
Outcome
enhanced yield and NUEe0
Qualifier
improved efficiency of N uptake utilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enhanced yield and NUE of AKH 4 and NHH 44 were attributed to the improved efficiency of N uptake utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUE declined from 21.6 at 40 kg ha −1 to 7.7 at 120 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
120 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
declinede0
Value
7.7e0
Qualifier
21.6e0
Comparator
40 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NUE declined from 21.6 at 40 kg ha −1 to 7.7 at 120 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake and utilization efficiencies were independent.

Outcome
N uptake efficiency and N utilization efficiency were independent of each othere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N uptake efficiency and N utilization efficiency were independent of each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake and utilization efficiencies complemented each other in improving NUE.

Outcome
improving NUEe0
Qualifier
N uptake efficiency and N utilization efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake efficiency and N utilization efficiency were independent of each other, but complemented each other in improving NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.