Paper · 2003 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Human Urine and Chicken Feces as Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Attractants for Resource-Poor Fruit Growers

Jaime Piñero; Martín Aluja; Alejandro Vázquez; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We evaluated human urine and chicken feces, two naturally occurring, inexpensive, and readily available substances, as baits for the capture of Anostrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) by using glass McPhail traps. Two studies were performed simultaneously in a commercial mango orchard in Veracruz, México. In the first study, we compared a 50% water dilution of human urine against hydrolyzed protein, both compounds at the fresh and 5-d-old stages, and water alone (control treatment). In the second study, we tested fresh chicken feces mixed with water, a torula yeast/borax solution at three different ages (1-4, 5-9, and 10-15 d), and water (control treatment). Both human urine and chicken feces were attractive to Anastrepha adults compared with water alone, but attracted two and three times fewer adults than hydrolyzed protein and torula yeast/borax, respectively. However, unlike torula yeast/borax, aging of human urine did not decrease its attractiveness. Five-day old human urine attracted numerically more A. serpentina females than males, similar numbers of A. obliqua males and females, and significantly more sexually immature A. obliqua females than mature ones. Chicken feces proved to be as attractive as the aged torula yeast/borax treatments for A. obliqua and A. serpentina. We argue that because both human urine and chicken feces are cost-free and can be easily obtained, they are viable, low-technology alternatives to costly commercial attractants, particularly for low-income growers or backyard farmers in Mexico and other Latin American countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Human urine and chicken feces attracted Anastrepha adults more than water alone but fewer than commercial baits.

Taxon
AnastrephaAnastrephae0
Treatment
human urine and chicken fecese0
Outcome
Anastrepha adultse0
Direction
fewere0
Value
two and three timese0
Comparator
water alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anastrepha
Anastrepha · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Division of Plant Industry Archive, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both human urine and chicken feces were attractive to Anastrepha adults compared with water alone, but attracted two and three times fewer adults than hydrolyzed protein and torula yeast/borax, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–873 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aging human urine did not decrease attractiveness, unlike torula yeast/borax.

Taxon
AnastrephaAnastrephae1
Treatment
aging of human urinee0
Outcome
attractivenesse0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anastrepha
Anastrepha · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Division of Plant Industry Archive, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“unlike torula yeast/borax, aging of human urine did not decrease its attractiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fruit Fly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both human urine and chicken feces were attractive to Anastrepha adults”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–737 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-day old human urine caught numerically more A. serpentina females than males.

Taxon
A. serpentinaAnastrepha serpentinae0
Treatment
Five-day old human urinee0
Outcome
femalese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
malese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anastrepha serpentina
Anastrepha serpentina · TaxonJorge Valdez, Colegio de Postgraduados, Mexico. jvaldez@colpos.mx · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five-day old human urine attracted numerically more A. serpentina females than males”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-day old human urine attracted similar numbers of A. obliqua males and females.

Taxon
A. obliquaAnastrepha obliquae0
Outcome
numbers of A. obliqua males and femalese0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anastrepha obliqua
Anastrepha obliqua · TaxonJorge Valdez, Colegio de Postgraduados, Mexico. jvaldez@colpos.mx · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar numbers of A. obliqua males and females”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-day old human urine attracted significantly more immature than mature A. obliqua females.

Taxon
A. obliquaAnastrepha obliquae0
Outcome
sexually immature A. obliqua femalese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
mature onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anastrepha obliqua
Anastrepha obliqua · TaxonJorge Valdez, Colegio de Postgraduados, Mexico. jvaldez@colpos.mx · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly more sexually immature A. obliqua females than mature ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken feces was as attractive as aged torula yeast/borax for A. obliqua.

Taxon
A. obliquaAnastrepha obliquae0
Treatment
Chicken fecese0
Outcome
attractivee0
Direction
as attractive ase0
Comparator
aged torula yeast/borax treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anastrepha obliqua
Anastrepha obliqua · TaxonJorge Valdez, Colegio de Postgraduados, Mexico. jvaldez@colpos.mx · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chicken feces proved to be as attractive as the aged torula yeast/borax treatments for A. obliqua and A. serpentina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1296 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken feces was as attractive as aged torula yeast/borax for A. serpentina.

Taxon
A. serpentinaAnastrepha serpentinae0
Treatment
Chicken fecese0
Outcome
attractivee0
Direction
as attractive ase0
Comparator
aged torula yeast/borax treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anastrepha serpentina
Anastrepha serpentina · TaxonJorge Valdez, Colegio de Postgraduados, Mexico. jvaldez@colpos.mx · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chicken feces proved to be as attractive as the aged torula yeast/borax treatments for A. obliqua and A. serpentina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1296 · show in text ↑