Paper · 1994 · Agronomy Journal

Growth, Seed Yield, and Oil Content of Canola Grown under Saline Conditions

Leland E. Francois

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
153
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Due to health concerns regarding saturated fat in the human diet, canola ( Brassica spp.) is becoming an increasingly important source of edible vegetable oil because of its low saturated fat content. This increased demand, and the need for crop diversification, will undoubtedly promote increased acreage of canola in the western USA, where some soils are or have the potential to become saline. Salt tolerance in two canola species ( B. napus L. cv. Westar and B. campestris L. cv. Tobin) was determined in a 2‐yr field plot study. Six salinity treatments were imposed on a Holtville silty clay (clayey over loamy, montmorillonitic [calcareous], hyperthermic Typic Torrifluvent) by irrigating with waters salinized with NaCl and CaCl 2 (1:1 w/w). Electrical conductivities of the irrigation waters ranged from 1.2 to 9.7 dS m −1 the first year, and 1.2 to 11.5 dS m −1 the second year. Seed yield, vegetative growth, oil content, and protein content in the oil‐free seed meal were measured. Relative seed yields of Westar and Tobin were unaffected by soil NaCl and CaCl 2 (1:1 w/w) 9.7 dS m −1 (electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract: EC e ), respectively. Each unit increase in salinity above the thresholds reduced the seed yield of Westar by 13.0% and Tobin by 14.3%. These results place both canola species in the salt‐tolerant category. Increased salinity did not significantly affect the oil or protein content of the oil‐free seed meal. Vegetative growth of both species was unaffected by soil salinity up to 10.0 dS m −1 and the growth decline above this threshold was 11.2% per unit increase in salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Westar seed yield was unaffected up to the stated salinity threshold.

Taxon
B. napus L.Brassica napuse1
Material
Westare1
Treatment
soil NaCl and CaCl 2 (1:1 w/w)e0
Outcome
Relative seed yieldse0
Direction
unaffectede0
Value
9.7 dS m −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative seed yields of Westar and Tobin were unaffected by soil NaCl and CaCl 2 (1:1 w/w) 9.7 dS m −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. napus L. cv. Westar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobin seed yield was unaffected up to the stated salinity threshold.

Taxon
B. campestris L.Brassica rapa subsp. oleiferae1
Material
Tobine1
Treatment
soil NaCl and CaCl 2 (1:1 w/w)e0
Outcome
Relative seed yieldse0
Direction
unaffectede0
Value
9.7 dS m −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative seed yields of Westar and Tobin were unaffected by soil NaCl and CaCl 2 (1:1 w/w) 9.7 dS m −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. campestris L. cv. Tobin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–498 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above the threshold, each salinity unit reduced Westar seed yield by 13.0%.

Taxon
B. napus L.Brassica napuse1
Material
Westare1
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each unit increase in salinity above the thresholds reduced the seed yield of Westar by 13.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1276 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. napus L. cv. Westar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–467 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above the threshold, each salinity unit reduced Tobin seed yield by 14.3%.

Taxon
B. campestris L.Brassica rapa subsp. oleiferae1
Material
Tobine1
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each unit increase in salinity above the thresholds reduced the seed yield of Westar by 13.0% and Tobin by 14.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. campestris L. cv. Tobin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not significantly affect oil content.

Treatment
Increased salinitye0
Outcome
oile0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased salinity did not significantly affect the oil or protein content of the oil‐free seed meal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not significantly affect protein content of oil-free seed meal.

Treatment
Increased salinitye0
Outcome
protein content of the oil‐free seed meale0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased salinity did not significantly affect the oil or protein content of the oil‐free seed meal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative growth of both canola species was unaffected up to 10.0 dS m −1.

Treatment
soil salinitye0
Outcome
Vegetative growthe0
Direction
unaffectede0
Value
10.0 dS m −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vegetative growth of both species was unaffected by soil salinity up to 10.0 dS m −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above the threshold, vegetative growth declined 11.2% per salinity unit.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
growth declinee0
Direction
declinee0
Value
11.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth decline above this threshold was 11.2% per unit increase in salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salinity · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 11 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.