Abstract
Studies of crop response to water and salt stress vary either salinity with a high leaching fraction or irrigation in the absence of salinity to isolate and quantify the effects of the two types of stress. Under deficit irrigation with saline water, a water conserving practice, the crop experiences simultaneous matric and osmotic stress, and it is not known if experiments designed to isolate stress effects may be used to predict crop response to simultaneous stresses. Thus, a study was conducted wherein yields were determined under varying levels of salinity and irrigation. Corn ( Zea mays L.) and melon ( Cucumis melo L.) were grown at the Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israel, and alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) at the Utah Power & Light Research Farm in Huntington, UT. Corn and melon plots were drip irrigated at six ratios of potential evapotranspiration ranging from 0.2 to1.7 in combination with four salinity levels. Alfalfa was irrigated with water of 0.2 and 4.0 dS m −1 from a line‐source sprinkler. For all three crops, the salinity treatments consisted of a control treatment with a salinity level less than published salt‐tolerance thresholds. Interactive effects of salinity and water stress were not observed in these field experiments. At low irrigation levels (≈70% of potential evaporation), yields were unaffected by the salinity level. At the higher irrigation levels, the salinity level caused significant differences in yield. Yield data were fit to piecewise linear models that emphasized the limiting nature of the effects of salt and water stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
At low irrigation (about 70% of potential evaporation), corn yields were unaffected by salinity level.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse2
- Treatment
- salinity levele1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- unaffectede1
- Qualifier
- low irrigation levels (≈70% of potential evaporation)e1
- Setting
- Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israele2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“At low irrigation levels (≈70% of potential evaporation), yields were unaffected by the salinity level”
e2“Corn ( Zea mays L.) and melon ( Cucumis melo L.) were grown at the Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israel”
Claim · model-written summary
At higher irrigation levels, salinity level caused significant differences in corn yield.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse2
- Treatment
- salinity levele3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Qualifier
- At the higher irrigation levelse3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Corn ( Zea mays L.) and melon ( Cucumis melo L.) were grown at the Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israel”
e3“At the higher irrigation levels, the salinity level caused significant differences in yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Interactive effects of salinity and water stress were not observed in corn, melon and alfalfa field experiments.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse2
- Treatment
- salinity and water stresse4
- Outcome
- interactive effectse4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Corn ( Zea mays L.) and melon ( Cucumis melo L.) were grown at the Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israel”
e4“Interactive effects of salinity and water stress were not observed in these field experiments”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
66 papers more in this group
See all 70 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.