Paper · 2001 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Field Studies of Crop Response to Water and Salt Stress

U. Shani; L. M. Dudley

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
224
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies of crop response to water and salt stress vary either salinity with a high leaching fraction or irrigation in the absence of salinity to isolate and quantify the effects of the two types of stress. Under deficit irrigation with saline water, a water conserving practice, the crop experiences simultaneous matric and osmotic stress, and it is not known if experiments designed to isolate stress effects may be used to predict crop response to simultaneous stresses. Thus, a study was conducted wherein yields were determined under varying levels of salinity and irrigation. Corn ( Zea mays L.) and melon ( Cucumis melo L.) were grown at the Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israel, and alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) at the Utah Power & Light Research Farm in Huntington, UT. Corn and melon plots were drip irrigated at six ratios of potential evapotranspiration ranging from 0.2 to1.7 in combination with four salinity levels. Alfalfa was irrigated with water of 0.2 and 4.0 dS m −1 from a line‐source sprinkler. For all three crops, the salinity treatments consisted of a control treatment with a salinity level less than published salt‐tolerance thresholds. Interactive effects of salinity and water stress were not observed in these field experiments. At low irrigation levels (≈70% of potential evaporation), yields were unaffected by the salinity level. At the higher irrigation levels, the salinity level caused significant differences in yield. Yield data were fit to piecewise linear models that emphasized the limiting nature of the effects of salt and water stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low irrigation (about 70% of potential evaporation), corn yields were unaffected by salinity level.

Treatment
salinity levele1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
unaffectede1
Qualifier
low irrigation levels (≈70% of potential evaporation)e1
Setting
Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israele2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“At low irrigation levels (≈70% of potential evaporation), yields were unaffected by the salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1379 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corn ( Zea mays L.) and melon ( Cucumis melo L.) were grown at the Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher irrigation levels, salinity level caused significant differences in corn yield.

Treatment
salinity levele3
Outcome
yielde3
Qualifier
At the higher irrigation levelse3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Corn ( Zea mays L.) and melon ( Cucumis melo L.) were grown at the Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–702 · show in text ↑
e3

“At the higher irrigation levels, the salinity level caused significant differences in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1472 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactive effects of salinity and water stress were not observed in corn, melon and alfalfa field experiments.

Treatment
salinity and water stresse4
Outcome
interactive effectse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Corn ( Zea mays L.) and melon ( Cucumis melo L.) were grown at the Arava Research and Development Farm in Yotvata, Israel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–702 · show in text ↑
e4

“Interactive effects of salinity and water stress were not observed in these field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1275 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

70 papers: 9 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.