Paper · 2005 · Agronomy Journal

Corn Grain Yield, Early Growth, and Early Nutrient Uptake as Affected by Broadcast and In‐Furrow Starter Fertilization

D. E. Kaiser; A. P. Mallarino; M. Bermudez

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
75
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In‐furrow starter fertilization for corn ( Zea mays L.) is being preferred to alternative starter application methods by farmers in the U.S. Corn Belt. This study assessed corn grain yield, early growth (V5 to V6), and early P and K uptake responses to in‐furrow P–K starter fertilization with or without broadcast P–K fertilization for 2‐yr corn–soybean [ Glycine Max (L.) Merr.] rotations. Sixteen trials were conducted on Iowa fields managed with no‐till or chisel‐plow tillage. Soil‐test P (STP) was 5 to 77 mg P kg −1 (Bray‐P 1 ), and soil‐test K (STK) was 88 to 237 mg K kg −1 (ammonium acetate). Treatments replicated four times were a control, 3–8–15 (N–P–K) liquid starter at 5 to 7 kg P ha −1 and 10 to 14 kg K ha −1 , granulated P–K fertilizer broadcast at 49 to 66 kg P ha −1 and 112 to 140 kg K ha −1 , and broadcast plus starter. Nitrogen was applied across all treatments. Fertilization increased grain yield at nine sites (0.80 to 2.11 Mg ha −1 ). Starter fertilization produced less yield than broadcast fertilization at five sites (0.30 to 1.48 Mg ha −1 less), four of which tested low in STP (≤15 mg P kg −1 ). Starter fertilization in addition to broadcast fertilization did not increase yield further at any site. Starter fertilization increased corn early growth and P and K uptake more than broadcast fertilization did at most sites. In‐furrow starter P–K fertilization for corn is not an effective practice when applied in addition to 2‐yr broadcast P–K fertilization rates for corn–soybean rotations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased corn grain yield at nine sites by 0.80 to 2.11 Mg ha −1.

Treatment
Fertilizatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.80 to 2.11 Mg ha −1e1
Qualifier
nine sitese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization increased grain yield at nine sites (0.80 to 2.11 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starter fertilization yielded 0.30 to 1.48 Mg ha −1 less than broadcast fertilization at five sites.

Treatment
Starter fertilizatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
lesse1
Value
0.30 to 1.48 Mg ha −1e1
Qualifier
five sitese1
Comparator
broadcast fertilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Starter fertilization produced less yield than broadcast fertilization at five sites (0.30 to 1.48 Mg ha −1 less)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding starter to broadcast fertilizer did not increase corn yield at any site.

Treatment
Starter fertilization in addition to broadcast fertilizatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
did not increasee1
Qualifier
at any sitee1
Comparator
broadcast fertilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Starter fertilization in addition to broadcast fertilization did not increase yield further at any site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starter fertilization increased early corn growth more than broadcast fertilization at most sites.

Treatment
Starter fertilizatione1
Outcome
corn early growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at most sitese1
Comparator
broadcast fertilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn early growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“Starter fertilization increased corn early growth and P and K uptake more than broadcast fertilization did at most sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starter fertilization increased early corn P and K uptake more than broadcast fertilization at most sites.

Treatment
Starter fertilizatione0
Outcome
P and K uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at most sitese0
Comparator
broadcast fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starter fertilization increased corn early growth and P and K uptake more than broadcast fertilization did at most sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1355 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that in-furrow starter P–K fertilization is ineffective alongside two-year broadcast rates.

Treatment
In‐furrow starter P–K fertilizatione0
Outcome
not an effective practicee0
Qualifier
when applied in addition to 2‐yr broadcast P–K fertilization rates for corn–soybean rotationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In‐furrow starter P–K fertilization for corn is not an effective practice when applied in addition to 2‐yr broadcast P–K fertilization rates for corn–soybean rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1524 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

130 papers: 88 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Direct-seeded maize after sunnhemp yielded 74% more than continuous conventional maize in 2007/08.

    ROTATION IN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS OF ZAMBIA: EFFECTS ON SOIL QUALITY AND WATER RELATIONS · 2010 · compared with maize in the conventionally ploughed control treatment with a continuous maize crop

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
  3. positive

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.