Paper · 1983 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Abscisic Acid-Induced Freezing Resistance in Cultured Plant Cells

Tony H. H. Chen; Lawrence V. Gusta

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
312
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of abscisic acid (ABA) on the cold hardiness of cell suspension was investigated. Cell suspension cultures of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss treated with 7.5 x 10(-5) molar ABA for 4 days at 20 degrees C could tolerate -30 degrees C, whereas the control cultures tolerated only -7 to -8 degrees C. The optimum concentration for increasing the cold hardiness of the cultures was 7.5 x 10(-5) molar. The degree of cold hardiness and the rate of hardening obtained by ABA treatment was significantly higher than that induced by low temperature alone. Of ten species tested, ABA was only effective on those cultures which were capable of cold hardening upon exposure to low temperatures. The results suggest that ABA bypasses the cold requirement for hardening and also suggests that ABA triggers the genetic system(s) responsible for inducing the hardening process.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA treated winter wheat cultures tolerated -30 degrees C compared with -7 to -8 degrees C in controls.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Norstare0
Treatment
7.5 x 10(-5) molar ABA for 4 days at 20 degrees Ce0
Outcome
toleratee0
Direction
could toleratee0
Value
-30 degrees Ce0
Qualifier
-7 to -8 degrees Ce0
Comparator
control culturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss treated with 7.5 x 10(-5) molar ABA for 4 days at 20 degrees C could tolerate -30 degrees C, whereas the control cultures tolerated only -7 to -8 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA treated winter rye cultures tolerated -30 degrees C compared with -7 to -8 degrees C in controls.

Taxon
winter ryeSecale cerealee0
Material
Cougare0
Treatment
7.5 x 10(-5) molar ABA for 4 days at 20 degrees Ce0
Outcome
toleratee0
Direction
could toleratee0
Value
-30 degrees Ce0
Comparator
control culturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss treated with 7.5 x 10(-5) molar ABA for 4 days at 20 degrees C could tolerate -30 degrees C, whereas the control cultures tolerated only -7 to -8 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA treated bromegrass cultures tolerated -30 degrees C compared with -7 to -8 degrees C in controls.

Taxon
bromegrasse0
Treatment
7.5 x 10(-5) molar ABA for 4 days at 20 degrees Ce0
Outcome
toleratee0
Direction
could toleratee0
Value
-30 degrees Ce0
Comparator
control culturese0

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss treated with 7.5 x 10(-5) molar ABA for 4 days at 20 degrees C could tolerate -30 degrees C, whereas the control cultures tolerated only -7 to -8 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum ABA concentration for increasing cultured-cell cold hardiness was 7.5 x 10(-5) molar.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
cold hardinesse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
7.5 x 10(-5) molare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum concentration for increasing the cold hardiness of the cultures was 7.5 x 10(-5) molar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–501 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA induced significantly higher cold hardiness than low temperature alone.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
ABA treatmente0
Outcome
degree of cold hardinesse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
low temperature alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degree of cold hardiness and the rate of hardening obtained by ABA treatment was significantly higher than that induced by low temperature alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–651 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA induced a significantly higher hardening rate than low temperature alone.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
ABA treatmente0
Outcome
rate of hardeninge0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
low temperature alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degree of cold hardiness and the rate of hardening obtained by ABA treatment was significantly higher than that induced by low temperature alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–651 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA was effective only in cultures capable of low-temperature cold hardening.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
ABA was only effective on those cultures which were capable of cold hardeninge0
Value
ten speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of ten species tested, ABA was only effective on those cultures which were capable of cold hardening upon exposure to low temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–787 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–245 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest ABA bypasses the cold requirement for hardening.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
ABAe0
Outcome
cold requirement for hardeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA bypasses the cold requirement for hardening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–245 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest ABA triggers genetic systems responsible for hardening.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
ABAe0
Outcome
hardening processe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA triggers the genetic system(s) responsible for inducing the hardening process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Norstar), winter rye (Secale cereale L. cv Cougar), and bromegrass Bromo inermis Leyss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–245 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.