Paper · 1994 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

A theoretical analysis of nitrogen and radiation effects on radiation use efficiency in peanut

GL Hammer; GC Wright

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
132
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Radiation use efficiency (RUE) of well-watered crops, measured as grams of biomass accumulated for each megajoule of intercepted total solar radiation, is affected by the level of leaf nitrogen in the canopy and has been related to the canopy specific leaf nitrogen (SLN; g N m-2 leaf area). A number of field experiments on peanut have measured RUE values greater than current theories predict on the basis of their canopy SLN levels. It is possible that these discrepancies between measured and theoretical values may be caused by non-uniform distribution of SLN in the canopy, incident radiation level, and/or the influence of diffuse radiation. In this study, we developed a theoretical framework to predict the consequences of these factors on RUE in peanut and used it to explain the causes of discrepancies between theory and practice. The framework is structured to determine photosynthesis of a layered crop canopy by distributing incident radiation among sunlit and shaded leaves in each layer. It allows for variation in incident direct and diffuse radiation associated with location (latitude), time of year, time of day, and atmospheric condition, which is expressed as the degree of transmission of extra-terrestrial radiation. It also allows for variation in photosynthetic capacity associated with average SLN of the canopy and its distribution in the canopy. Daily canopy photosynthesis, intercepted radiation, and RUE are obtained by numerical integration of instantaneous values calculated at specific times of the day. The framework predicted experimentally determined RUE values accurately and quantified the contribution of each major factor to variation in RUE. On clear days, with high canopy SLN, RUE was predicted to be 1.l g MJ-1. The major cause of previous underestimation of RUE was found to be variation in RUE associated with the level of incident radiation flux density as affected by the degree of atmospheric transmission. RUE increased by up to 0.4 g MJ-1 as atmospheric transmission decreased from 0.75 (clear sky) to 0.35 (heavy cloud). However, varying incident radiation by changing time of year or latitude did not affect RUE. Partitioning incident radiation into direct and diffuse components and consideration of canopy gradients in SLN both had significant effects on RUE, but of a lesser magnitude than effects of degree of atmospheric transmission. The former caused increases in RUE of up to 0.15 g MJ-l, while the latter caused increases of up to 0.13 g MJ-1 at low canopy SLN. Hence, by quantifying the understanding of plant physiological processes and integrating appropriately to the canopy scale, this theoretical framework has explained the causes of discrepancies between measured RUE and previous theoretical estimates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The framework predicted measured RUE accurately.

Outcome
RUE valuese0
Comparator
experimentally determined RUE valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The framework predicted experimentally determined RUE values accurately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Under clear skies and high SLN, predicted RUE was 1.l g MJ-1.

Outcome
RUEe0
Value
1.l g MJ-1e0
Qualifier
clear days, with high canopy SLNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On clear days, with high canopy SLN, RUE was predicted to be 1.l g MJ-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1757 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Atmospheric transmission was identified as the major cause of previous RUE underestimation.

Outcome
underestimation of RUEe0
Qualifier
degree of atmospheric transmissione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major cause of previous underestimation of RUE was found to be variation in RUE associated with the level of incident radiation flux density as affected by the degree of atmospheric transmission.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1957 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

RUE increased by up to 0.4 g MJ-1 as atmospheric transmission fell from 0.75 to 0.35.

Outcome
RUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 0.4 g MJ-1e0
Setting
atmospheric transmissione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RUE increased by up to 0.4 g MJ-1 as atmospheric transmission decreased from 0.75 (clear sky) to 0.35 (heavy cloud).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1958–2074 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Changing time of year or latitude did not affect RUE.

Treatment
changing time of year or latitudee0
Outcome
RUEe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varying incident radiation by changing time of year or latitude did not affect RUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2084–2167 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Separating direct and diffuse radiation increased RUE by up to 0.15 g MJ-l.

Treatment
radiationt0
Outcome
RUEe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
up to 0.15 g MJ-le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The former caused increases in RUE of up to 0.15 g MJ-l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2395–2450 · show in text ↑
t0

“A theoretical analysis of nitrogen and radiation effects on radiation use efficiency in peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy SLN gradients increased RUE by up to 0.13 g MJ-1 at low SLN.

Treatment
canopy SLNe0
Outcome
RUEe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
up to 0.13 g MJ-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The former caused increases in RUE of up to 0.15 g MJ-l, while the latter caused increases of up to 0.13 g MJ-1 at low canopy SLN.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2395–2525 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

18 papers: 7 positive, 11 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.