Paper · 2007 · Agronomy Journal

Irrigation to Maximize Vaccine Antigen Production in Genetically Modified Tobacco

G. Stevens; E. Vories; M. Mulesky; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A protective antigen (PA) gene from Bacillus anthracis Cohn has been inserted into tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) chloroplasts to produce an anthrax vaccine. The PA protein is the primary immunogen of human vaccines for anthrax disease. The objective of this study was to determine the optimum soil water content for producing antigen vaccine in tobacco leaves. High leaf antigen concentration is important in vaccine manufacturing. Protective antigen tobacco, transformed from ‘Petite Havana SR1’, was transplanted to native soil (fine‐loamy, mixed, thermic Typic Argiudolls) in a greenhouse floor. Treatments consisted of soil water potential (Φ) irrigation thresholds (−20, −34, −48, and −62 kPa) based on sensors buried 10 cm in soil. Since plant growth is normally stimulated when soil moisture is readily available, we hypothesized that soil moisture might dilute leaf PA content. Results showed that increasing biomass with optimum irrigation did not dilute PA in leaves. Using ELISA quantification, −34 kPa irrigation threshold averaged 529 μg PA kg −1 leaf fresh weight for two ratoon harvests. Leaves from drier irrigation treatments did not have significantly higher PA content or biomass. Tobacco grown with more frequent irrigations using −20 kPa Φ threshold averaged less biomass and produced leaves with significantly lower antigen. In a separate experiment, gravimetric soil water use was compared between nontransgenic Petite Havana and PA plants at button growth stage. Genetic engineering tobacco for PA caused reduced leaf area in plants. Transpiration was significantly higher with nontransgenic plants, indicating that lower irrigation rates may be needed for antigen tobacco.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The −34 kPa irrigation threshold gave an average of 529 μg PA per kg leaf fresh weight over two ratoon harvests.

Treatment
−34 kPa irrigation thresholde1
Outcome
PAe1
Value
529 μg PA kg −1 leaf fresh weighte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Genetically Modified Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“−34 kPa irrigation threshold averaged 529 μg PA kg −1 leaf fresh weight for two ratoon harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves from drier irrigation treatments did not have significantly higher PA content or biomass.

Treatment
drier irrigation treatmentse2
Outcome
PA content or biomasse2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Genetically Modified Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaves from drier irrigation treatments did not have significantly higher PA content or biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum irrigation, which increased biomass, did not dilute PA in leaves.

Treatment
optimum irrigatione3
Outcome
PA in leavese3
Direction
did not dilutee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Genetically Modified Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results showed that increasing biomass with optimum irrigation did not dilute PA in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More frequent irrigation at the −20 kPa threshold gave less biomass.

Treatment
more frequent irrigations using −20 kPa Φ thresholde4
Outcome
biomasse4
Direction
lesse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Genetically Modified Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tobacco grown with more frequent irrigations using −20 kPa Φ threshold averaged less biomass and produced leaves with significantly lower antigen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More frequent irrigation at the −20 kPa threshold gave significantly lower leaf antigen.

Treatment
more frequent irrigations using −20 kPa Φ thresholde4
Outcome
antigene4
Direction
significantly lowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Genetically Modified Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tobacco grown with more frequent irrigations using −20 kPa Φ threshold averaged less biomass and produced leaves with significantly lower antigen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic engineering for PA reduced leaf area in tobacco plants.

Organ / stage
button growth stagee6
Treatment
Genetic engineering tobacco for PAe5
Outcome
leaf areae5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
nontransgenic Petite Havanae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Genetically Modified Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
e5

“Genetic engineering tobacco for PA caused reduced leaf area in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1558 · show in text ↑
e6

“gravimetric soil water use was compared between nontransgenic Petite Havana and PA plants at button growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1487 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration was significantly higher in nontransgenic plants.

Material
nontransgenic plantse7
Outcome
Transpiratione7
Direction
highere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Genetically Modified Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
e7

“Transpiration was significantly higher with nontransgenic plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1624 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that lower irrigation rates may be needed for antigen tobacco.

Outcome
lower irrigation ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Genetically Modified Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“indicating that lower irrigation rates may be needed for antigen tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1698 · show in text ↑

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.